Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> NorCal Beverage Company <br /> July 1, 1993 <br /> Page 2 <br /> have been successful in removing most, if not all, of the petroleum <br /> contaminants. This most certainly eliminates the potential threat <br /> it once posed, and satisfies one of the requirements stated in Ms. <br /> Thayer's 20 July 1992 evaluation letter. However, soil was <br /> excavated to a maximum depth of 24.7 feet below surface, only 15. 3 <br /> feet above the 1986 groundwater measurement. The requirement for <br /> a groundwater investigation is consistent with the Regional Water <br /> Board's "Staff Recommendation for Preliminary Evaluation and <br /> Investigation of Underground Tank Sites" dated 10 August 1990 <br /> (refer to Case III. 1. Seasonal High ground water less than 50 <br /> feet) . <br /> On September 6, 1991, PHS/EHD received a NCBC letter describing <br /> details of two additional monitoring wells, 2 soil borings, and <br /> probable vapor extraction wells that were to be proposed within a <br /> workplan. This proposal was never carried out. PHS/EHD received <br /> a telefax communication from NCBC detailing an abbreviated approach <br /> to the site's groundwater investigation by only drilling soil <br /> borings and collecting a groundwater sample from the existing <br /> monitoring well. In a November 30, 1992 telephone conference call <br /> between Russell Juncal of Resna, Pat Riddle, Attorney at Law, and <br /> Diane Hinson of PHS/EHD, discussion again focused on the need to <br /> proceed with a complete groundwater assessment investigation. An <br /> agreement during that telephone conversation was reached for the <br /> preparation of a workplan for additional monitoring wells and a <br /> soil investigation to evaluate a risk assessment approach to the <br /> contaminated soil. Instead, PHS/EHD received an April 16, 1993 <br /> workplan for an additional overexcavation attempt for the removal <br /> of the remaining contaminated soil. The workplan did not indicate <br /> that closure would be sought at the conclusion of the field <br /> activities. <br /> NCBC has requested a meeting to discuss the June 3 , 1993 Resna <br /> report and the request for site closure. The meeting has been <br /> scheduled for Thursday, July 1, 1993 at 2 :00 p.m. in the offices of <br /> PHS/EHD. PHS/EHD has agreed to the meeting with NCBC, NCBC's <br /> attorney, and consultant; however, no decision contrary to the <br /> directives of this letter will be made at the July 1, 1993 meeting. <br /> PHS/EHD will accept new evidence presented at the meeting and you <br /> will be notified following PHS/EHD's evaluation of new evidence <br /> presented. <br />