Laserfiche WebLink
sail&x ties Repot <br /> 1800 E.FtemM 9.,3aelanri,CA <br /> prajea Na 150005.00 <br /> PNP 2 <br /> In May 1991, Emcon Associates installed one groundwater monitoring well (MW-1) in the <br /> approximate center of the backfilled tank pit. Analyses of soil samples collected during well <br /> installation are summarized in Table 1. A groundwater sample was collected in June 1991 and was <br /> reported to contain 100 parts per billion (ppb) TPHG and 1.6 ppb benzene (Table 2). Groundwater <br /> was encountered at 69 feet below grade. <br /> Well MW-1 was resampled in September 1991. Duplicate samples were sent to two separate <br /> laboratories. An additional duplicate sample was collected by the SJCEHD and submitted to a third <br /> laboratory for analysis. Analytical results are summarized in Table 2. The sample collected by the <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division did not contain hydrocarbon constituents above <br /> method detection limits. <br /> In January 1992, Kleinfelder, Inc. drilled two soil borings through the backfill near the southwest <br /> corner and the north-central area of the previous excavation. The locations of borings B-1 and B-2 <br /> are shown on Figure 2. Boring B-1 was drilled at a 20° angle to the west in order to partially assess <br /> the lateral migration of petroleum hydrocarbons in that direction. No analytes were detected in the <br /> samples collected from B-1. In boring B-2, 0.0072 parts per million (ppm) xylenes were reported <br /> in the sample from 30 feet below grade and TPHD (1.5 ppm) was detected at a depth of 40 feet., <br /> . Groundwater was also monitored and sampled in January 1992. Depth to water was measured at 69 <br /> feet below grade, as it was in June 1991. Samples were analyzed for BTEX and TPHG. No <br /> analytes were detected. Based on this and previous sampling events, it does not appear that <br /> groundwater has been impacted by vertical migration of petroleum hydrocarbons, and that the low <br /> levels of petroleum hydrocarbons detected during the first monitoring round may have been due to <br /> introduction during well installation. <br /> SCOPE OF WORK <br /> The following scope of work was based upon the information collected during previous site <br /> investigations. The work was designed to remove the remaining impacted soil in the vicinity of the <br /> former tanks. All field work was performed under the supervision of RESNA personnel in <br /> accordance with the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan and with the Site Safety and Health Plan <br /> (Attachment 1 & 2, Workplan for Soil Excavation, March 8, 1993). <br /> Soil Excavation and Sampling <br /> On May 13, 1993 residual petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil was excavated from the two <br /> remaining areas of impacted soils identified during previous excavation and soil boring activities. <br /> One area of concern was located near the center of the former 500 gallon tank location beginning <br /> at a depth of approximately 16 feet. A second area was near the southwest corner of the excavated <br /> pit (in the vicinity of boring B-1) at a depth of approximately 22 feet and near the former dispenser <br /> location. Approximately 150 cubic yards of petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soil was removed from <br /> PAR-0593.FNL <br />