Laserfiche WebLink
Well Installation and Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Second Quarter 2008 <br /> 1950 West Fremont Street,Stockton, California <br /> 2.4 SAMPLE HANDLING AND ANALYSIS <br /> All groundwater samples were sealed in their appropriate containers, labeled with a unique identifier, <br /> placed in a cooler with ice, and shipped to the analytical laboratories under chain-of-custody (COC) <br /> protocol. Groundwater samples were submitted to the following state-certified laboratories for analyses: <br /> • Maxxam Analytics, Inc. (Maxxam) located in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada for MDMA analyses <br /> with ultra-low detection limits. Groundwater samples submitted for NDMA analysis were <br /> collected into unpreserved 1-liter amber bottles. <br /> ' • TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. Pleasanton (TestAmerica) located in Pleasanton, California for <br /> dissolved CAM 17 metals (500-mL poly bottle preserved with nitric acid), volatile organic <br /> compounds (VOCs) (40-mL VOAs preserved with HCl) and semi-volatile organic compounds <br /> (SVOCs) (unpreserved 1-liter amber bottles)analyses. <br /> ' Copies of CDCs for the groundwater samples are provided in Appendix D. <br /> 2.5 SLUG TESTING <br /> Slug testing was performed on the new wells. These tests consisted of both slug-in tests (also known as <br /> slug tests or falling head slug tests) and slug-out tests (also known as bail tests or rising head slug tests). <br /> The tests were performed to determine the hydraulic conductivity of the geologic materials of the <br /> screened interval of the well. The hydraulic conductivity results are utilized in the development of <br /> groundwater velocities for the site. <br /> ' Testing was performed using a solid PVC displacement object (slug), 1.5 inches in diameter and 5.7 feet <br /> in length. This size of slug created a water-level change of approximately 3 feet within the well casing. <br /> This magnitude of water-level change was deemed sufficient to stress the aquifer and obtain reliable <br /> results. Water level change data were collected using a self-contained, factory calibrated, data-logging <br /> pressure transducer called a Mini-Troll Pro®. The water in the well was displaced by lowering the slug <br /> rapidly, creating a water level rise. The water level then gradually fell to its original level. Once the <br /> ' water level had recovered completely, the slug was removed rapidly and the water level dropped. The <br /> gradual recovery to static or nearly static conditions was recorded. The datalogger data were <br /> downloaded in the field and transmitted, along with the field data sheets, for analysis. <br /> Project 102790 6 July 2008 <br />