My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE HISTORY
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREMONT
>
2085
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545152
>
SITE HISTORY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2020 3:06:42 PM
Creation date
1/9/2020 2:57:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE HISTORY
RECORD_ID
PR0545152
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0004021
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON CITY TAXI CAB COMPANY
STREET_NUMBER
2085
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
FREMONT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14111223
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2085 E FREMONT ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AT C 1117 Lone Palm Avenue, Suite B <br /> YV <br /> Modesto, CA 95351 <br /> www.atcassociates.com <br /> 209-579-2221 <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C . Fax 209-579-2225 <br /> Environmental, Geotechnical and Materials Engineers <br /> ♦ Criterion 3: <br /> This alternative can be implemented within regulatory guidelines. <br /> ♦ Criterion 4: <br /> The ozone sparging remediation alternative would require the installation of multiple ozone <br /> sparging wells, and remediation equipment. The equipment is significantly smaller in size as <br /> compared with a groundwater remediation system. Additional costs would be incurred for <br /> permitting, purchase, renting or leasing the remediation equipment, remediation system <br /> installation, and operation and maintenance of the system. The cost of this alternative is <br /> estimated to be $450,000 to $750,000. <br /> ♦ Criterion 5: <br /> This alternative should in the short term, within the initial 12 months of operation, effectively <br /> reduce the concentrations of contaminants on-site. Also over the long term, 36 to 60 months, <br /> ozone sparging has the capability to reduce the petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants <br /> dissolved in groundwater to regulatory levels. <br /> ♦ Criterion 6: <br /> This alternative can be reasonable implemented given the current site use and conditions. Also, <br /> regulatory acceptance of this alternative is generally positive, given similar site conditions. <br /> During construction of the remediation system there would be disruption to on-site activities. <br /> The equipment compound aesthetics and operation and maintenance activities are minimal and <br /> are not likely adverse to the community. <br /> 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on the soil and groundwater data collected to date, ATC recommends proceeding with <br /> remedial activities at this site by conducting vapor extraction and ozone sparging pilot tests. SVE <br /> and ozone air sparging appear to be the best alternatives to effectively remediate petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon-impacted soil and groundwater. Upon regulatory concurrence of the recommended <br /> pilot testing activities, ATC will begin making arrangements for conducting the pilot tests to <br /> evaluate the effectiveness of SVE and ozone sparging as remedial technologies for this site. <br /> s:\environmental\28349\reports\feasibility.doc 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.