Laserfiche WebLink
Stockton City Taxi Cab Co. , Inc. -2- March 8, 2000 <br /> COST PRE-APPROVAL BREAKDOWN <br /> Task Amount Pre-Approved Comments <br /> Planning & permits $557 <br /> Two soil borings $4430 30 ' and 50' soil borings <br /> Technical report preparation $ 1872 <br /> TOTAL PRE-APPROVED $ 65859 <br /> • The actual costs and scope of work performed must be consistent with the pre-approval for it <br /> to remain valid. <br /> • The work products must be acceptable to the County and the Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board. <br /> • If a different scope of work becomes necessary, then you must request pre-approval of costs <br /> on the new scope of work. <br /> • Although I have referred to the WHF, Inc. proposal in my pre-approval above, please be <br /> aware that you will be entering into a private contract: the State of California cannot compel <br /> you to sign any specific contract. This letter pre-approves the costs as presented in the <br /> proposal dated February 8, 2000 by WHF, Inc . for conducting the work approved by the <br /> County for implementing the September 21 , 1999 WHF, Inc, workplan. <br /> I also want to remind you that the Fund' s regulations require that you obtain at least three bids, <br /> or a bid waiver from Fund staff, from qualified firms for all necessary corrective action work. <br /> The legislation governing the Fund requires that the Fund assist you in procuring contractor and <br /> consultant services for corrective action. If you need assistance in contracting for corrective <br /> action services, don't hesitate to call me. <br /> Please remember that it is still necessary to submit the actual costs of the work as explained in <br /> the Reimbursement Request Instructions to confirm that the costs are consistent with this pre- <br /> approval before you will be reimbursed. Please insure that your consultant prepares their <br /> invoices to include the required break down of costs on a time and materials basis, that <br /> invoiced tasks are consistent with the original proposal, and that reasonable explanations are <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> Q4 Recycled Paper <br />