Laserfiche WebLink
Yvv <br /> 1117 Lone Palm Avenue, Suite B <br /> Modesto, CA 95351 <br /> www.atcassoc iates.com <br /> 20WLT9-579-2221 <br /> ASS <br /> o C i ATE s I N C . Fax 209-579-2225 <br /> Environmental,Geotechnical and Materials Engineers <br /> diameter PVC casing, with MW8, MW9, MW10, and MW 11 extending to a depth of 65 feet bgs in <br /> the shallow groundwater bearing zone, MWS, MW6, and MW12 extending to a depth of 90 feet bgs <br /> in the intermediate groundwater bearing zone, and MW7 extending to a depth of 121 feet bgs in the <br /> deep groundwater bearing zone. <br /> Monitoring wells MW5, MW6, MW8, MW9, MW10, and MW12 were developed on December 22 <br /> and 23, 2004. An obstruction encountered in MW7 at approximately 64 to 65 feet bgs prevented <br /> development of this well. MW11 was purged dry after removing 0.5 gallons of water. Efforts to <br /> develop this well using a bailer revealed the presence of grout inside the well and the total depth of <br /> the well was measured to be approximately 58 feet. <br /> On December 22 and 23, 2004 monitoring wells MW1 through MW12 were surveyed relative to <br /> NAD 83 and NGVD29 for position and elevation and groundwater samples were collected from <br /> MW1 through MW6, MW8, MW9, MW10, and MW12. Petroleum hydrocarbon constituents were <br /> detected in soil samples collected from the boreholes of MW5 through MW9 and MW12. <br /> Groundwater samples were not collected from MW7 and MW11 due to an obstruction in MW7 and <br /> grout infiltration in MW 11. Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in the groundwater samples <br /> collected from MW 1 through MW6, MW8 through MW10, and MW12. The results of the subsurface <br /> investigation activities are presented in ATC's Subsurface Investigation Report, dated July 25, 2005. <br /> .' On April 7, 2005, an ATC geologist supervised the destruction of MW 11 and the installation of <br /> replacement monitoring well MW 11 R to a depth of approximately 65 feet bgs using 2-inch diameter <br /> schedule 40 PVC casing. Refer to ATC's First and Second Quarter 2005 Monitoring Report, dated <br /> October 10, 2005, for additional information. <br /> SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> The depth to water was measured in MW 1 through MW 10, MW 11 R, and MW 12 (Figure 3) on <br /> March 20, 2006. The monitoring wells were purged and sampled on March 20 and 21, 2006. Prior to <br /> collection of groundwater samples, the depth to water was measured in the wells and the pH, <br /> electrical conductivity, and temperature were measured in groundwater purged from the monitoring <br /> wells and recorded. A minimum of three well casing volumes were purged from each monitoring <br /> well prior to sampling. The wells were allowed to recover and samples were collected from each well <br /> using disposable polyethylene bailers. <br /> The groundwater samples collected from each well were submitted to State-certified Argon <br /> Laboratories (Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program Certification. No. 2359) in Ceres, <br /> California for chemical analyses of total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPHg) _ <br /> utilizing EPA Method 8015M, and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), methyl <br /> tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE) di-isopropyl ether (DIPS), tertiary <br /> amyl ether (TAME), tertiary butyl ether (TBA), 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), and 1,2- <br /> dibromoethane (EDB) utilizing EPA Method 8260B. Groundwater well purge and sample logs are <br /> included in Attachment 1. <br /> s;lenviromentai1283491reports12006 IQMR.doc 2 ATC Associates Inc. <br />