Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 2 <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 4:11 PM <br /> To: 'Murphy, Mike' <br /> Cc: Laurie Brown [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 2494 E. Fremont Street, Stockton <br /> Permit SR#0044441 was issued to Greg Drilling on October 19, 2005. It is valid for one year. If you would like <br /> you can transfer it to another site for a $20 transfer fee. <br /> The permit copy is the receipt and they (the CPT permit also) were handled to your Feld tech on November 2, <br /> 2005 at the site inspection for the CPT work. <br /> You may contact the accounting supervisor Laurie Brown (cc'd) if you have any further questions. <br /> From: Murphy, Mike [mailto:mmurphy@cambria-env.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 2:29 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 2494 E. Fremont Street, Stockton <br /> I assume that is County policy? Can we get a receipt so I can pass costs through? Alternately, could we <br /> apply costs to another upcoming project/permit? <br /> Mike Murphy <br /> Senior Project Scientist <br /> Cambria Environmental Technology, Inc. <br /> 270 Perkins Street, Sonoma, CA 95476 <br /> Phone: 707.933.2367 <br /> FAX: 707.935.6649 <br /> Cell: 510.385.3116 <br /> A Woman-Owned Business <br /> This a-mai/may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient Any review or <br /> distribution by others is strictly prohibited.If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and delete all <br /> copies. <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 2:31 PM <br /> To: Murphy, Mike <br /> Subject: RE: 2494 E. Fremont Street, Stockton <br /> Unfortunately, once deposited, no refunds. <br /> From: Murphy, Mike [mailto:mmurphy@cambria-env.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 10:44 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: 2494 E. Fremont Street, Stockton <br /> Mike, <br /> For this project,we previously submitted two permit applications—one for CPT work at the site <br /> and one for well installations at the site. Subsequently it was determined that the wells were not <br /> 10/27/2006 <br />