Laserfiche WebLink
w <br /> CAMB RIA <br /> ® Table I Site Conceptual Model,Shell-branded Service Station,2494 East Fremont Street,Stockton,California <br /> 2 6 Groundwater Definition Status MTBE has been detected (by EPA Method 8260) in groundwater sample <br /> (oxygenates and lead from wells at this site only four times, all at concentrations below 5 0 ppb <br /> scavengers) MTBE is sufficiently defined considering the low detections and the <br /> existing well network DIPE has been detected in groundwater samples <br /> from the wells at concentrations as high as 12 7 ppb The existing well <br /> network should be sufficient for delineation of DIPS in groundwater <br /> Ethanol,TBA, ETRE, and TAME have not been detected in groundwater <br /> samples collected from the site wells Methanol has been detected once <br /> in two wells at concentrations of 4,300 and 5,600 ppb Numerous grab <br /> groundwater samples have been collected from borings at this site and <br /> analyzed for methanol Methanol was not detected in any of these <br /> samples Methanol delineation appears to be complete EDB has been <br /> detected only twice in groundwater samples from the wells at <br /> concentrations of 8 9 and 350 ppb Grab groundwater samples collected <br /> from borings drilled at the site have not contained EDB, which <br /> demonstrates that EDB is not a widespread problem at this site <br /> 1,2-DCA has been detected in each site well at concentrations ranging <br /> from 2 2 to 540 ppb Well S-4 1,2-DCA concentrations show a <br /> drecreasing trend Additional 1,2-DCA assessment is warranted <br /> 2 7 Oxygenate and Lead There have been so few detections of MTBE that the concentration trend <br /> Scavenger Plume Stability and cannot be properly analyzed DIPE concentrations are showing a <br /> Concentration Trends decreasing trend Ethanol,TBA, ETBE, and TAME have not been <br /> i <br /> detected in groundwater samples collected from the site wells Methanol <br /> i <br /> has been detected once in two wells at concentrations of 4,300 and 5,60 <br /> ppb EDB detections have been too few for a trend analysis Well S-4 <br /> 1,2-DCA concentrations show a drecreasing trend <br /> 2 8 Groundwater Flow Direction, Shallow groundwater flow direction vanes at the site, but is predominently <br /> Depth Trends and Gradient toward south-southeast The gradient in the shallow zone ranges from <br /> Trends 0 0002 to 0 005, which equates to an average of 0 0015 Depth to water <br /> (in the shallow groundwater zone), over the past two years, has ranged <br /> from 46 to 55 feet below grade The groundwater flow direction and <br /> gradient trends in the deep zone have not yet been established as there <br /> have been only two monitoring events for this zone Depth to water in <br /> the deep groundwater zone has ranged from approximately 51 to 55 feet <br /> below grade The vertical gradient between the shallow and deep <br /> groundwater zones appears to be neutral (ie, groundwater elevation in <br /> the shallow zone is generally the same as it is in the deep zone) <br /> 2 9 Stratigraphy and Hydrogeology The site is underlain primarily by fine-grained sediments (clay and silt) <br /> with lesser amounts of coarse-grained sediments (sand and gravel) The <br /> coarse-grained sediments primarily occur at three depth intervals (with <br /> varying thicknesses) 10 to 30 fbg, 70 to 85 fbg, and 105 to 115 fbg The <br /> coarse-grained sediments have not been found in every boring at these <br /> depths so it may be that they are not laterally continuous beneath the site <br /> 0955 Page 2 of Date Modified 8/14/2003 <br />