My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2006 - 2018
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
3505
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231848
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2006 - 2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2023 1:33:46 PM
Creation date
1/10/2020 1:36:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2006 - 2018
RECORD_ID
PR0231848
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0002052
FACILITY_NAME
NuStar Terminals Operations Partnership L.P.
STREET_NUMBER
3505
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16203004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3505 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring System Certification- Page 2 of 3 <br /> RECt.Y .� <br /> Site Address: 3505 Navy Dr. Date of 1'esting/Servicing: 5194114 <br /> JUN Y Y 2014 <br /> U. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> ENVIRpNMEN�- <br /> Software Version Installed. 4.003 ��,, ',,`A,- � <br /> �EpAR�" E�4-r <br /> Com lete the following checklist: <br /> a Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> a Yes 0 No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> a Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> Do Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> 0 Yes 0 No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment(e.g.modem) <br /> ® N/A operational? <br /> 0 Yes 0 No* For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> a N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected? If yes:which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) 0 Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? 0 Yes 0 No <br /> ❑ Yes 0 No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e.no <br /> a N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill paints)and operating properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 0 % <br /> ❑ Yes* a No Was any monitoring equipment replaced?If yes, identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> Cl Yes* a No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> 0 Product;0 Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> M Yes 0 No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set-up reports, if a licable. <br /> a Yes 0 No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> * In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: Tank is monitored by 2nd Piping Sump Sensor(ALS)-Tested&Passed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.