My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE HISTORY
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREMONT
>
2804
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545172
>
SITE HISTORY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2020 10:57:22 AM
Creation date
1/13/2020 10:42:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE HISTORY
RECORD_ID
PR0545172
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0009349
FACILITY_NAME
DIESEL PERFORMANCE INC
STREET_NUMBER
2804
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
FREMONT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14343001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2804 E FREMONT ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
s <br /> CENET Evaluation f Introducdoo <br /> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> This summary provides a brief overview of the information collected <br /> during the CENET evaluation of the JFT-11'M bioremediation process for Bio <br /> Converters, Inc. The initial goals of the evaluation were to gauge the efficacy of <br /> the process on diesel, trichloroethylene (TCE), and DDT contaminated soil and to <br /> study the working mechanism of the microbial biotransformation of the process. <br /> One particular interest was finding the energy source used by the microbes under <br /> reduced oxygen conditions. However, many of the results obtained were <br /> inconclusive and some answers were unobtainable, primarily due to limited <br /> funding and associated time constraints. <br /> The two largest difficulties with the evaluation were heterogeneity of <br /> samples and the presence of remediating bacteria in the control reactors. <br /> Although the soil used in the tests was carefully spiked and mixed with the <br /> contaminants, test results did not reach the level of concentration that had been <br /> applied and there were always large differences between adjacent samples in the <br /> same reactor (i.e. non-detect, then in thousands), making tracking concentration <br /> changes over time difficult. Also, though the soil used had been autoclaved, the <br /> control reactors were found to contain unexpectedly large populations of both <br /> general and selective bacteria prior to treatment. The high populations of <br /> substrate specific organisms were atypical, because adaptation of native soil <br /> bacteria into specific contaminant degrading microbes generally requires a <br /> significant length of time, often years,. Unfortunately, the presence of these <br /> microbes in the control reactors complicated the evaluation and made it <br /> impossible to use of the results of control reactor tests to represent handling, <br /> evapurativu, and/or incidental contaminant losses. Since all of the test reactors <br /> were prepared in the same room, it is possible that JFT-1Tm somehow <br /> contaminated the control soil as the soils were being prepared and packed into <br /> the reactors. If this cross contamination did occur, then the controls were also <br /> JFT-1 TU reactors. <br /> Although many of the results were, as previously mentioned, <br /> inconclusive or unobtainable, some correlations were found which support the <br /> representations of the process and previous project findings provided by BCI at <br /> the beginning of the evaluation. The evaluation did find substrate specific, <br /> selective microbial activity for all contaminants tested, in both contaminated soil <br /> and water. This microbial activity proceeded at the speed of aerobic metabolism <br /> 1-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.