Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> ATC <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> and groundwater samples contained detectable concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons? Field <br /> activities and analytical results were detailed in ATC's Summary Report ofA&btional Subsurface <br /> Investigation, dated January 8, 1999 <br /> In December 1999, ATC personnel supervised the advancement of soil borings MW2, MW3, and <br /> MW4 at the site to depths of approximately 65 feet bgs to evaluate groundwater for the presence <br /> of petroleum hydrocarbons and determine the gradient direction and magnitude The bonngs <br /> were completed as groundwater monitoring wells Analytical data indicated that soil samples <br /> from boring MW2 contained detectable concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons Petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons were also detected in the groundwater from well MW2 Well MM3 contained very <br /> low concentrations of only a few constituents and well MW4 was nondetect Field activities and <br /> analytical results were detailed in ATC's Summary Report of Additional Subsurface <br /> Investigation, dated February 24, 2000 <br /> GROUNDWATER ELEVATION <br /> Water level measurements were collected from wells MW1 through MW4 on September 22, <br /> 2000 Water levels ranged from 47 83 to 48 19 feet below the tops of the well casing elevations <br /> representing an average decrease in the water table elevation of approximately 2 72 feet since <br /> June 2000 The water level data were used to develop the groundwater elevation contour map <br /> (Figure 3) Assuming that horizontal isotropic conditions prevail, groundwater in the uppermost <br /> aquifer beneath the site flowed generally towards Ce southwes�th a northwest component The <br /> average hydraulic gradient on September 22, 2-MO-was calculated to be 0 003 Rift or <br /> approximately 16 ft/mule A summary of groundwater monitoring data is presented in Table 1 <br /> SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> On September 22, 2000, groundwater samples were collected by ATC personnel from monitoring <br /> wells MWI through MW4 The locations of the monitoring wells are shown on Figure 2 Prior <br /> to collection of the groundwater samples, the depth to water, pH, electrical conductivity, and <br /> temperature were measured in each monitoring well and recorded A nummum of three well <br /> casing volumes was purged from each well prior to sampling The wells were allowed to recover <br /> and a sample was collected from each well using a dedicated disposable bailer Groundwater well <br /> purge and sample logs are contained in Attachment I <br /> The groundwater samples collected from the wells were submitted to State-certified Sequoia <br /> Analytical (FLAP Cert No 1624) for chemical analysis of total petroleum hydrocarbons as <br /> gasoline (TPHg), total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd), total petroleum hydrocarbons - <br /> as kerosene (TPBk), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX)utilizing EPA 8015 and <br /> 8020 methodologies, and oxygenate fuel additives including methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) <br /> utilizing EPA 8260 methodology <br /> w w2577Vrports\3fa-2000 aoc 2 <br />