Laserfiche WebLink
C 0 <br /> VNYATC <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> In December 1999, ATC personnel supervised the advancement of soil borings MW2, MW3, and <br /> MW4 at the site to depths of approximately 65 feet bgs to evaluate groundwater for the presence <br /> of petroleum hydrocarbons and to determine the gradient direction and magnitude The borings <br /> were completed as monitoring wells Analytical data indicated that soil samples collected from <br /> boring MW2 contained detectable concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons Petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons were also detected in a groundwater sample collected from well MW2 A <br /> groundwater sample collected from MW3 contained very low concentrations of only a few of the <br /> requested analytes Petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in the groundwater sample <br /> collected from MW4 Field activities and analytical results are detailed in ATC's Summary <br /> Report ofAdditional Subsurface Investigation, dated February 24, 2000 <br /> In December 2001, soil-boring VEW1 was advanced to approximately 35 feet bgs, and borings <br /> VEW2 and VEW3 were advanced to approximately 45 feet bgs Borings MWS, MW6, and <br /> MW7 were advanced to approximately 65 feet bgs Soil borings VEW 1, VEW2, and VEW3 <br /> were completed as 2-inch diameter vapor extraction wells and soil borings MW5, MW6, and <br /> MW7 were completed as 2-inch diameter groundwater monitoring wells Boring CPT1 was <br /> advanced to approximately 100 feet bgs utilizing a truck-mounted cone penetration test (CPT) <br /> rig A soil vapor extraction pilot test was conducted which yielded a radius of influence (ROI) of <br /> approximately 30 feet, at a vacuum of 115 inches of water Approximately 2 64 pounds of total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPHg), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and <br /> xylenes (BTEX) were removed during the vapor extraction pilot test Soil vapor extraction <br /> appeared to be a viable method for remediating TPHg and BTEX impacted soil at the site Field <br /> activities and analytical results are detailed in ATC's Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, <br /> dated November 19, 2002 <br /> SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> On July 8, 2004, groundwater samples were collected by ATC personnel from monitoring wells <br /> MW I through MW7 The locations of the monitoring wells are shown on Figure 2 Prior to <br /> collection of the groundwater samples, the depth to water was measured in the monitoring wells <br /> and pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature were recorded and turbidity was visually <br /> observed for groundwater purged from each monitoring well A minimum of three well casing <br /> volumes was purged from each well prior to sampling The wells were allowed to recover and a <br /> sample was collected from each well using a disposable bailer Groundwater well purge and <br /> sample logs are contained in Attachment 1 <br /> The groundwater samples collected from the wells were submitted to State certified Argon <br /> Laboratories Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) Certification No 2359, <br /> for chemical analyses of TPHg, total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as diesel (TPHd), and - _- <br /> total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as kerosene (TPHk) utilizing EPA Method 8015B, <br /> BTEX utilizing EPA Method 8021B, and oxygenate fuel additives including methyl tert-butyl <br /> ether (MTBE) utilizing EPA method 8260B <br /> S 16257713QR-2004 doc 2 <br />