Laserfiche WebLink
CvvATc <br /> A S S O C L A T E S E !V C <br /> activities and analytical results were detailed in ATC's Summary Report of Additional <br /> Subsurface Investigation, dated January 8, 1999 <br /> In December 1999, ATC personnel supervised the advancement of soil boirngs MW2, MW3, and <br /> MW4 at the site to depths of approximately 65 feet bgs to evaluate groundwater for the presence <br /> of petroleum hydrocarbons and determine the gradient direction and magnitude The borings <br /> were completed as monitoring wells Analytical data indicated that soil samples from boring <br /> MW2 contained detectable concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons Petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> were also detected in the groundwater from well MW2 Groundwater from well MW3 contained <br /> very low concentrations of only a few constituents and well MW4 was nondetect Field <br /> activities and analytical results were detailed in ATC's Summary Report of Additional <br /> Subsurface Investigation, dated February 24, 2000 <br /> In December 2001, soil-boring VEW1 was advanced to approximately 35 feet bgs, and borings <br /> VEW2 and VEW3 were advanced to approximately 45 feet bgs Borings MW5, MW6, and <br /> MW7 were advanced to approximately 65 feet bgs Soil borings VEWI, VEW2, and VEW3 <br /> were completed as 2-inch diameter vapor extraction wells and soil borings MW5, MW6, and <br /> MW7 were completed as 2-:rich diameter groundwater monitoring wells Boring CPTI was <br /> advanced to approximately 100 feet bgs utilizing a truck-mounted CPT rig A soil vapor <br /> extraction pilot test was conducted which yielded a radius of influence (ROI) of approximately <br /> 30 feet Approximately 2 64 pounds of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), <br /> • benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) were removed during the vapor extraction <br /> pilot test Soil vapor extraction appeared to be a viable method for remediating TPHg and BTEX <br /> impacted soil at the site Field activities and analytical results were detailed m ATC's Remedial <br /> Investigation/Feasibility Study, dated October 21, 2002 <br /> GROUNDWATER ELEVATION <br /> Water level measurements were collected from wells MW I through MW7 on January 23, 2003 <br /> Water elevations ranged from a high of —30 96 to a low of —3104 representing an average <br /> increase in water table elevation of 0 98 feet since October 2002 The water level data were used <br /> to develop the groundwater elevation contour map (Figure 3) Review of the groundwater <br /> elevation contour map (Figure 3) indicates that the hydraulic gradient beneath the site on January <br /> 23, 2003 is relatively flat and the gradient varies across the site A summary of groundwater <br /> monitoring data is presented in Table I <br /> SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> On January 23, 2003, groundwater samples were collected by ATC personnel from monitoring <br /> wells MWI through MW7 The locations of the monitoring wells are shown on Figure 2 Prior <br /> to collection of the groundwater samples, the depth to water, pH, electrical conductivity, and <br /> temperature were measured in each monitoring well and recorded A minimum of three well <br /> casing volumes was purged from each well prior to sampling The wells were allowed to recover <br /> w lwordpro162577UQR-2003 doc 2 <br />