Laserfiche WebLink
(\TIATC <br /> • A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> In December 1999 ATC personnel supervised the advancement of soil boirngs MW2, MW3, and <br /> MW4 at the site to depths of approximately 65 feet bgs to evaluate groundwater for the presence <br /> of petroleum hydrocarbons and determine the gradient direction and magnitude The borings <br /> were completed as monitoring wells Analytical data indicated that soil samples from boring <br /> MW2 contained detectable concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons Petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> were also detected in the groundwater from well MW2 Well MW3 contained very low <br /> concentrations of only a few constituents and well MW4 was nondetect Field activities and <br /> analytical results were detailed in ATC's Summary Report of Additional Subsurface <br /> Investigation, dated February 24, 2000 <br /> GROUNDWATER ELEVATION <br /> Water level measurements were collected from wells MW 1 through MW4 on June 15, 2001 <br /> Water level elevations ranged from a high of—23 32 to a low of—23 38 representing an average <br /> decrease in water table elevation of 0 63 feet since March 2001 The water level data were used <br /> to develop the groundwater elevation contour map (Figure 3) Assuming that horizontal <br /> isotropic conditions prevail, groundwater in the uppermost aquifer beneath the site flowed <br /> generally towards the south with a slight depression located at the approximate former tank <br /> location The average hydraulic gradient on June 15, 2001 was calculated to be 0 001 ft/ft or <br /> approximately 5 ft/mile A summary of groundwater monitoring data is presented in Table 1 <br /> • SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> On June 15, 2001, groundwater samples were collected by ATC personnel from monitoring <br /> wells MW 1 through MW4 The locations of the monitoring wells are shown on Figure 2 Prior <br /> to collection of the groundwater samples, the depth to water, pH, electrical conductivity, and <br /> temperature were measured in each monitoring well and recorded A minimum of three well <br /> casing volumes was purged from each well prior to sampling The wells were allowed to recover <br /> and a sample was collected from each well using a disposable bailer Groundwater well purge <br /> and sample logs are contained in Attachment 1 <br /> The groundwater samples collected from the wells were submitted to State certified Argon <br /> Laboratories (ELAP Cert No 2359) for chemical analysis of total petroleum hydrocarbons as <br /> gasoline (TPHg), total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd), and total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as kerosene (TPHk) utilizing EPA method 8015 modified, benzene toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) utilizing EPA method 8020, and oxygenate fuel additives <br /> including methyl tert butyl ether (MTBE) utilizing EPA method 8260 <br /> ANALYTICAL RESULTS - - <br /> The groundwater samples collected from wells MW 1 and MW2 contained detectable <br /> concentrations of TPHg at concentrations of 980 µg/L and 400 gg/L, respectively Benzene was <br /> detected at wells MW 1 and MW2 at concentrations of 27 pg/L and 17 gg/L, respectively <br /> w Iwordpro15257712QA 2001 doe 2 <br />