Laserfiche WebLink
Estimated Vapor Extraction Removal Volumes <br /> I Volume <br /> contaminant rniffafRecovenE Rate Recovered: <br /> 1 i Iblhr I i Ibs <br /> f I <br /> T PHg 166 111 84 6,710 <br /> ' Benzene 016 3 84 230 <br /> MTBE 00003 00072 1 0 4 1 <br /> i E I <br /> Assumptions <br /> -99% Reduction in 180 days <br /> ' -2nd degree parabola removal rate <br /> ' The two treatment systems being considered for the site would have some similar features Both <br /> systems will require a fenced enclosure with a vehicle gate, a power pole and electric panel, and a <br /> connection to existing MW-2 Both systems may require a City of Stockton Building Permit and <br /> ' will require -Stanislaus Coty�ir Discharge Permit <br /> The option to use a positive displacement blower with vapor phase carbon would incorporate a <br /> Rotron EN 606 blower capable of producing up to 70 scfiri at 68-1n-H,0 vacuum A minimum <br /> of two, 2,000-1b-capacity vapor phase carbon vessels would adsorb hydrocarbons and fuel <br /> oxygenates prior to air being discharged to atmosphere <br /> Using the conservative concentrations reported recovered at approximately 70 scfin during <br /> Reporting Event 1 (TPHg = 4 66 lb/hr, benzene = 0 16 lb/hr, MTBE = 0 0003 lb/hr), US Filter- <br /> ' Westates calculated an initial carbon usage at a rate of approximately 600 lb/day Using the <br /> assumptions stated above, carbon usage over the 6-month life of the project would be <br /> approximately 36,000 lbs <br /> ' The electric catalytic oxidizer is a skid-mounded arilt that includes a high vacuum blower, <br /> ' vapor/liquid separator, liquid holding tank and transfer pump, electric oxidizer tank with catalyst <br /> cell, heat exchanger, electric panel, and system instruments and controls The proposed unit is a <br /> Soleco100 Electric Acetylic Oxidizer (Appendix D) <br /> ' Because the purchase cost of the carbon greatly exceeds the capital cost of the catalytic oxidizer <br /> (approximately S 43,000), the package urut is clearly the treatment of choice for the initial <br /> ' system When concentrations decline sufficiently after 4 to 6 months, the oxidizer can be replace <br /> by vapor please carbon to save energy costs <br /> ' A cost estimate for the catalytic oxidizer system from purchase thru start-up, is presented in <br /> Appendix E <br /> 7 <br /> s lenvcromenm 1\62577 -Diesel PerAreportslintenm_remb'2 doc <br />