Laserfiche WebLink
cm/year(14 incheslyear) based on actual rainfall amounts, with 6 storms per year lasting <br /> 2 days each over a 5 month period. <br /> 3) Soil Column Data <br /> The sail column was modeled with a 25%effective porosity over the entire interval, a <br /> conservative estimate based on the silty clay/silty sand lithology at the site.The soil bulk <br /> density was assumed to be 1.65 g/cm*3, consistent with other measured bulk densities in <br /> the Stockton area (#9-1918).The hydrocarbon source area was assumed to be the area <br /> surrounding the former middle UST(determined by soil sampling to be the highest <br /> impacted area) and was modeled as measuring 7m by 7m. <br /> A) Layer 1 - Practical Scenario <br /> Layer 1 was modeled as a 7.62 meter thick(from 0'-25'depth) silty clay layer based on <br /> site boring logs.The intrinsic permeability was conservatively estimated to be 1 e-10 cm*2 <br /> ( 1e-4 cm/sec) based on lithology.The fraction Organic Carbon was conservatively <br /> estimated to be 0.05% (500 mg/Kg)for this layer. Chevron site#9-1916 had a 0.175% <br /> (1750 mg/Kg) organic carbon content based on two soil measurements. <br /> The mass of BTEX and Naphthalene (surrogate for TPH-gas)were determined for this <br /> layer by inputting the highest concentrations of these contaminants found in the onsite <br /> soil borings and monitor wells into the following formula: <br /> Mass (Kg) = Contamingnt matft*Volume it * *Soil Densily(KUIrn*j <br /> 1 e+6 mg/Kg <br /> where the volume of impacted soil was defined as 7m by 7m by 7.62 m for Layer 1 or <br /> 373 m*3; and the soil density is defined as 1650 Kg/m*3. <br /> Benzene was never detected in site soil borings or monitor well soils,therefore,the mass <br /> of benzene for this scenario was modeled as 0 Kg. Soil results from MW-415' (To <br /> 0.042 mg/Kg, E @ 0.46 mg/Kg, X @ 9.1 mg/Kg and:TPH-g @ 130 mg/Kg) had the <br /> highest concentrations of TEX and naphthalene for the site.The toluene mass was <br /> calculated to be 0.026 Kg;the ethylbenzene mass was calculated to be 0.28 Kg;the <br /> xylene mass was calculated to be 5.6 Kg and the TPH-g mass was calculated to be 80 <br /> Kg for the source area. <br /> B) Layor 1-Conservative Scenario <br /> The modeled parameters for this scenario differed only in the mass of contaminant <br /> present in the layer. The analytical results from sample#218 (18 foot depth in UST pit) <br /> for benzene,toluene and naphthalene and from MW-4-15'for ethylbenzene and xylene <br /> were used to derive BTEX and TPH-g mass for this scenario using the above equation. <br /> The results were: Benzene at 7.39 Kg,toluene at 23.4 Kg, ethylbenzene at 0.28 Kg, <br /> xylene at 5.6 Kg and TPH-g at 677 Kg. <br /> C) Layer 2- Practical and Conservative Scenarios <br /> Layer 2 was modeled as a 6.1 m thick(20 feet,from 25'-45') silty sand layer based on <br /> lithology logs from the site soil borings.The intrinsic permeability was modeled as 1 e-8 <br /> cm*2 (1 a-2 cm/sec) and the fraction Organic Carbon was assumed to be 0.05% (500 <br /> mg/Kg). Xylene was detected at a maximum concentration of 0.038 mg/Kg in the MW-4- <br /> 35' sample. The mass of xylene in Layer 2 for both Scenarios was 0.019 Kg. Because <br /> there was no BTE or TPH-g detected from 25-45 feet in soil boring SBI, located <br />