Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Site Closure Page 4 <br /> Chevron U.S.A. Products Company,3246 East Fremont Street, Stockton, CA January 3, 1995 <br /> sample #318 to the north, and MW-4 and EA-6 and MW-1 (no benzene) to the east. The <br /> extrapolated boundaries of hydrocarbon extent from 15-30 feet BGS is defined by pit sample #1 to <br /> the south, non-existent to slight hydrocarbon odors noted in boring logs from 26-30 feet BGS in <br /> MW-3 (GTI, 1987) to the west, low benzene concentrations in pit sample #3, and benzene <br /> concentrations below laboratory detection limits in MW-4 and MW-1. Although laboratory data does <br /> not exist for each sampling point at the 15-30 ft. BGS interval, declining concentrations in each <br /> direction allow for extrapolation of hydrocarbon-impacted soil boundaries (Figure 4). In fact the <br /> presence of low and non-detectable concentrations in soil samples collected from MW-4 and SB-1 <br /> indicate that significant volatilization and/or biologic degradation of hydrocarbons has occurred <br /> throughout the time the UST pit was left open for approximately one year. <br /> Based on a estimated lateral extent of approximately 5nn squares faet and an estimated vertical <br /> extent of 25 feet (15 - 40 feet BGS), total volume of hydrocarbon impacted soil is approximately 465 <br /> cubic yards. Using a conservatively high estimate of 130 ppm asap average concentration of <br /> hydrocarbon impacted soil in the calculated soil volume, hydrocarbon mass to be left in place is <br /> approximately 200 pounds (approximately 30 gallons gasoline equivalent) (Attachment 3). <br /> On June 2, 1994 quarterly groundwater sampling event, no wells on site showed measurable <br /> concentrations of hydrocarbons (Figure 7, Table 2). Hydraulic gradient at the site has varied with <br /> the season as shown In Figures 8 and 9 and by others (EA, 1990). Dissolved hydrocarbons have <br /> not been detected in groundwater since the February 1988 groundwater sampling event when <br /> groundwater elevations were an average of 19.65 feet below mean sea level (MSL) approximately 26 <br /> feet higher than in June 1994. In February 1988, wells MWs-1 through 3 and EA-1, 2 and 4 <br /> contained detectable concentrations of dissolved hydrocarbons up to 250 parts per billion (ppb) <br /> TPH-G. Groundwater samples obtained from EA-1, 3 and 4 in April and .lune 1989 were below <br /> laboratory detection limits for BTEX and TPH-G when average groundwater elevations were 21.06 <br /> and 28.06 below MSL, respectively. Dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations and groundwater <br /> elevations over time are plotted on Figure 10. The graph shows the absence of dissolved <br /> hydrocarbons in groundwater when elevations fell below 20 feet below MSL. Groundwater sampled <br /> from MWs-1, 2 and 3 in 1987 and 1988 was likely sampled from a perched groundwater zone of <br /> limited volume and areal extent. Wells EA-1 through 4 are screened at similar depths as MWs-1 <br /> through 3 and have been dry since September 1989, indicating the limited areal extent and limited <br /> lifespan of the previously perched groundwater zone. In fact the existence of the perched zone is <br /> coeval with the exposed tank cavity, which may have caused an artificial recharge basin for wells <br /> MW-1 through 3 between 1987 and 1988, prior to the backfilling of the UST pit. Groundwater <br /> elevations are currently an average of 46.87 feet below MSL, approximately 26 feet lower than levels <br /> measured in February 1988. Because of the lack of measurable concentrations of hydrocarbons in <br /> groundwater and the vertical distance between the impacted soil and the current water-bearing zone <br /> 0072clos.rpt <br /> ❑01W GROUNDWATER <br /> ❑D❑ TECHNOLOGY , <br />