Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 2 <br /> Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> From: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 3:57 PM <br /> To: 'Tim Cuellar' <br /> Subject: RE:.Grewal's Market <br /> Tim: <br /> y <br /> y <br /> Based on the information provided in your eMa;il below, it is not necessary to advance soil boring P-15 adjacent to ' <br /> CPT-2. Since P-15 will not be advanced adjacent to CPT-2, are you changing the name of soil boring P-16 to P- <br /> 15, and P-17 to P-16? <br /> i <br /> Vicki McCartney, Senior REHS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> i <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 600 East Main Street <br /> Stockton,California 95202 <br /> Phone: (209)468-9852 <br /> Fax: (209)468-3433 <br /> Email: _mccartney_ci.sjceli;d, <br /> From: Tim Cuellar [ma i Ito:tcuel lar@adv'geoenv.com] <br /> Sent:Monday, April 21, 2008 2:50. PM <br /> To: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Subject: Grewal's Market <br /> Vicki, <br /> Don't forget we scheduled CPT work at Grewal's for Tuesday and Wed O. <br /> I wanted you to take a quick look at the attached. We previously advanced CPT-02 on the south <br /> side of the mini-mart building. The boring was advanced to 100 feet bsg and we collected grab <br /> water samples at depths of approx. 56-59, 77-80 and 91-94. <br /> The work plan called for another boring (P-15) adjacent to CPT-02, and for a first ground water <br /> sample to be collected. Based on-the last round of ground water monitoring performed at the site <br /> on 17 April 2008, the ground water level at the site (MW-4) was recorded at 53 %feet bsg. Based <br /> on current ground water conditions, if we try to collect a sample between 54-56 feet, we really <br /> wouldn't be gaining anything since we already have data in this area between 56-59 feet. <br /> Just wanted to get your feedback prior to us setting up on that hole (P-15) . Thanks -Tim <br /> f <br /> C - <br /> Timothy J. Cuellar <br /> 4/21/2008 <br />