My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011427
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREMONT
>
4100
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545177
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011427
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2020 5:27:09 PM
Creation date
1/13/2020 4:15:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011427
RECORD_ID
PR0545177
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0002123
FACILITY_NAME
GREWALS GAS & LIQUOR*
STREET_NUMBER
4100
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
FREMONT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
14333046
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4100 E FREMONT ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 22 July 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 97-0327 <br />' Page 2 of 4 <br />' 2.2. GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br /> After each well was purged, ground water levels were remeasured to verify the amount of ground <br />' water recharge. Upon achieving at least 80% ground water recharge, samples were collected from <br /> wells MW-I through MW-4 utilizing the techniques described above in purging each well. Ground <br /> water samples were transferred into 40-m1 EPA-approved volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials <br />' containing 0.5 ml 18%hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative and 1-liter amber bottles without <br /> sample preservative. Care was taken to ensure that visible air bubbles were not present in the vials j <br /> after filling and capping. Ground water sample containers were labeled with the well designation, <br /> date, time, and sampler's initials. <br /> 2.3. Laboratory Analysis of Ground Water Samples <br /> Each ground water sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form,placed in a chilled container and <br /> rtransported to Castle Analytical Laboratory (CAL) of Atwater, a California Department of Health <br /> Services (DHS)-certified laboratory. The ground water samples were analyzed for: <br />' . Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and d'esel (TPH-g and TPH-d, <br /> respectively) by EPA Method 5030/8015 and 8015B; ,a "°yar <br /> 1 Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene (BTEX)"nethyl-tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) <br /> ethylene dibromide (EDB), 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), tertiary butanol (TBA), di- <br /> isopropyl ether(DIPE),ethyl Cert butyl ether(ETBE)and tert amyl methyl ether(TAME)by <br />' EPA Method 5030/8260. <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br />' Field data was utilized to determine ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient.Petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon-impact to ground water was quantified by laboratory analysis. <br />' 3.1. GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br />' The depths. to .ground-water in. wells MW-1-through MW-4 were measured-between 58.39 and <br /> 59.75 feet below the tops of well casings; ground water elevations in wells MW-1 through MW-4 <br /> were calculated to be between 32.9 feet (MW-4) and 33.00 feet(MW-3) below mean sea level <br /> (Figure 3). Ground water elevation at the site generally increased an average 0.95 feet between the <br /> • October 2002 and the June 2003 ground water monitoring events. Ground water flow direction for <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.