Laserfiche WebLink
06 November 2000 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No. 97-0327 <br /> ' Page 2 of 4 <br /> public access. <br /> 2.2. GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br /> ' Following well purging, ground water levels in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 were <br /> allowed to achieve a minimum of 80 percent recharge prior to sample collection. Ground water <br /> ' samples were collected from the purged wells utilizing new disposable polyethylene bailers, one <br /> 1-liter amber bottle without a preservative and four 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA vials containing 0.5 <br /> ml 18%hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative. Care was taken to ensure that visible air bubbles <br /> were not present in the vials after filling and capping. Ground water sample containers were labeled <br /> 1' with the well designation, date, time, and sampler's initials. <br /> 2.3. LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATERAMPL <br /> S ES <br /> ' Each ground water sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form,placed in a chilled container and <br /> transported to a California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified laboratory for analysis <br /> for: <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d, <br /> respectively) by EPA Method 8015M, <br /> • Volatile aromatic compounds - benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene (BTEX) with <br /> methyl-tertiary butyl ether(MTBE) by EPA Method 8020, and <br /> ' • Fuel oxygenated compounds - ethylene dibromide (EDB), dichloroethane (1,2 DCA), <br /> methanol, ethanol, tertiary butanol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tert butyl ether <br />' (ETBE) and tert amyl methyl ether(TAME), and MTBE by EPA Method 8260 Modified. <br />' 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br /> 31 August 2000; the contaminant impact to ground water was assessed from the laboratory data. <br /> 3.1. — RELATIVE RELATIVE GROUNDWATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT -- <br /> The depths to ground water in wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 were between 48.62 and 50.32 feet <br /> • below the tops of the well casings; ground water elevations at the site were calculated to be between <br /> 23.48 feet and 23.48 feet below mean sea level. Ground water elevation at the site decreased an <br /> average 3.72 feet between the May 2000 and the August 2000 ground water monitoring events. <br /> Ground water elevations are depicted in Figure 3. <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />