Laserfiche WebLink
J � • " Yt Yy 4` <br /> yj r <br /> ! <br /> 'A <br /> Q <br /> Alternative Boundaries in <br /> ItSolid Waste Management <br /> by P. A. Domenico and V. V. Palciauskasa <br /> I <br /> i <br /> t <br /> I <br /> ABSTRACT constitute a semiquantitative measure of the dilution <br /> Recent trends in solid waste management seem to Potential of waste sites prior to intensive investigations For <br /> favor the establishment of minimum performance criteria compliance and regulatory purposes,a simple model for <br /> for waste facilities, as opposed to case by case detailed maximum concentration predictions is dei eloped for one- <br /> operational requirements This implies some generally dimensional steady flow and dispersion in directions <br /> acceptable sipper limit of contamination,say as provided by perpendicular to the flow path This model is reasonably <br /> the primary and secondary Maximum Conceatratiota Level operational with a minimum of data in that it avoids <br /> (AICL's)developed by the Environmental Protection Agency chemical reaction and the inherent fitted parameter known <br /> Not so easily defined is the compliance point iLt which the as longitudinal dispersion,and employs the actual measured <br /> ICL's may be applied, which can range from the solid waste concentrabon at the solid waste boundary as a boundary <br /> boundary (a containment option) to some alternative condition The model thus provides a conservative esamate <br /> boundary outside the actual waste facility (a retardation of whether or not minimum performance standards kill be <br />' opfion) In either cue, it follows that any contaminant achieved at an alternative boundary <br /> migration into the public domain beyond the acceptable <br /> boundary must enter below the MCL The containment INTRODUCTION <br /> option would appear to be stncrly a matter of engineering <br />' design of the waste facility With the retardation option, The recent proliferanon of environmental <br /> protection laws seems to coincide in time with a <br /> however, there is need for a simplified procedure for assess- <br /> merit of the hydrogeologic environment responsible for corresponding proliferation of transport models <br /> retardation and attenuation of the contaminant stream with a predictive capability for environmental <br /> These are largely dilution and reaction processes In this impact The literature demonstrates numerous <br /> paper,some mechanisms of dilution are examined, including site-specific studies, especially with regard to <br /> geometrical spreading of a contaminant plume, recharge' radionuclide transport and cert sin heavy metal from precipitation, and mixing with surface-water bodies <br /> This analysis focuses on average value calculations that migration (Baetsle, 1969, Cherry and others, 1973, <br /> Pinder, 1973) In spite of this available technology, <br /> there is still some doubt that the transport model <br /> 'Department of Gcology, Univi-rsim of Illinois at is a practical answer to many patrnn sI c�ntamina- <br /> Champaign-Urbana, lilinuis 61820 tion problems There are several reasons for this, <br /> Received July 1981, rn ised Octobcr 1981,accepted including the cost and time-consuming nature of <br /> January 1982 site-specific investigations, the high level of <br /> Discussion open until No%cmber 1, 1982 uncertainty in the available data base, and the <br />