Laserfiche WebLink
f <br /> however,greatly affects L' and rhe:concenrration iR <br /> _ CL', occurring there. <br /> It is clear from these developments that the <br /> variable aquifer thickness H is the most significant <br /> parameter affecting dilution potential It is noted <br /> further that as the thickness of the plume at the <br /> waste boundary (L.1) approaches the aquifer thick- <br /> ness (H), the distance L' approaches zero and CL' Z <br /> tapproaches Co }VC <br /> Mixing with Continuous Recharge <br /> From Figure 2, the shaded area is assumed to <br /> be contaminated ground water moving with a }Q-' <br /> velocity Vc [equation (1)) , and is continuously Fig 2 Plume mixing with Continuous recharge <br />' replenished by a recharge rate R (a volume of <br /> water per unit area per unit time) Let m be the <br /> amount of mass of the pollutant in the shaded to some distance L is in the range of 10 years, <br /> region which has a volume V of z2"n, where z is an 100 years, 1000 years, then CL/Co = 0 91, 0 s, and <br /> average plume thickness, 2 is a unit distance, and 0 09, respectively Clearly, those contaminants <br /> n has already)jeen defined as the porosity The with long travel times (low flow velocities or large <br /> 1 change in concentration with nme is then distribution coefficients) undergo significant <br /> dC d(m/V) -m dV 1 dm --m dV --Cl dV dilution <br /> — <br /> dt dr + V dt m dt=— — = — — When applied to some alternative boundar} , <br /> - - V� dt V dt V� dt equation (1 1) is better expressed <br /> (9) 1 <br /> where dm/dr = 0 since dispersion and kinetic L - o 1 + (R/z)(L/V,) (1` <br /> effects are assumed to be absent The increase in -� <br /> fluid volume dVfdt is lust the recharge volume per where," is the Concentration as measured at the <br /> unit time. Hence, dV/dt = R22n if mixing of fresh waste boundary, and L is the distance to the <br /> water with the pollutant is 100% effective Subsn- alternative boundary where the concentration is <br /> tuting into equation (9) for dV/dt gives expected to be CL If the plume does not <br /> extend over the full thickness of the aquifer <br /> ' dC dt - 2 R£2n (10) with,n this region, z is taken as an average plume <br /> m <br /> thickness and R is modified to include only that <br /> part of the recharge rate that effectively mixes <br /> Integrating from zero to time t yields with the plume This latter value can only be a fiery <br /> 1 _rough estimate under the best of conditions <br /> C(t) = Co 1 + {R/z} t {11) <br /> Mixing with Streartis <br /> where Co is an initial concentration,z is an average Most ground water, by nature of its :not ement <br /> plume thickness,and R is the recharge rate that from topographically high areas to topographically <br /> effectively mixes with the plume over the thickness low areas will eventually discharge into streams or <br /> z rivers To compute a dilution factor for discharge <br /> _Equation (11) is best applied to that part of a of contaminated water into a flowing stream, as <br /> plume that occupies most of the thickness of an depicted by Figure 3, one must determine the <br /> aquifer For this case, Co is the concentration total contaminant added during some time period <br /> where the plume first assumes such a thickness, r, and the total volume of water in the stream that <br /> z = H is the aquifer thickness, and R is the recharge accepted this discharge during this time period Ur <br /> rate As an example, assume a conservative dilution J be the flux (average discharge per unit time per <br /> rate of 1%, i e , R/z equals 0 01 yr-' This means unit area) of the contaminant at the stream <br /> What C(t) equals C,,(I + 0 Olt) where Co is the boundary The flux J equals CLVL, where CL 1,111 <br /> oncentrarion where the plume first assumes the Vc are the concentration of the contaminant and <br /> full thickness of the aquifer If the transport time its velocity at the stream aquifer boundary, <br /> 307 <br />