My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011649
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREMONT
>
4343
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545181
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011649
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 3:37:59 PM
Creation date
1/14/2020 2:26:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011649
RECORD_ID
PR0545181
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0010425
FACILITY_NAME
Pacific Paper Tube
STREET_NUMBER
4343
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
FREMONT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4343 E FREMONT ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> ' 4.1 Conclusions <br />' The analytical data for the former Nestle site in Stockton, California indicates that the <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon compounds found in the soil are limited in depth and extent <br /> Twelve soil samples were collected In November 1994 and only one soil sample was <br />' impacted Groundwater samples collected from the on site monitor>_ng well do not <br /> indicate any impacts <br />' The present soil conditions were modeled to determine the potential for the petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon compounds to migrate to groundwater The modeling showed that the <br /> compounds detected in the soil are expected to take more than 10,000 years to reach <br />' groundwater and that their concentrations would be less than their respective drinking <br /> water standards <br /> The remedial alternatives evaluation indicates that the "no action" alternative is <br /> appropriate for this site This conclusion is based on the fact that the soil excavation and <br /> disposal alternative would be prohibitively expensive and would only serve to move the <br /> impacted soil to another location (landfill) The soil excavation and incineration <br /> alternative would be even more expensive, and the potential benefits to human health and <br /> the environment would not improved over those of the no-action alternative The <br /> ' groundwater monitoring alternative will not yield conclusive results because of the <br /> extended length of time it would take for the source to reach the groundwater Therefore, <br /> "no action" is the appropriate alternative for this site <br /> 4.2 Recommendation <br />' Based on the results of the model and the discussion of other alternatives, EMCON <br /> recommends no further action for the Site <br /> 1\PMRXK00285 DOC-951 lc 1 Rev 0 8/28/95 <br /> 22074-001 001 4-1 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.