Laserfiche WebLink
v <br /> • Some minor changes to this approach were made during the field sampling and in consultation with <br /> the SJC EHD representative as the work proceeded as noted below <br /> 1.0 Field Methods - Exploratory Barings and Field Modifications <br /> Four exploratory bonngs were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 Drilling permits were <br /> secured from SJC EM, and a subsurface utility clearance was performed prior to doing the <br /> fieldwork <br /> The boreholes were drilled with hollowstem auger truck mounted drilling equipment All drilling <br /> equipment and sampling tools were cleaned pnor to arriving, and before leaving the site The <br /> sampler was advanced collecting soil samples at five-foot intervals in each borehole. Soil samples <br /> retained for chemical analysis were contained from the liners at depths of suspected or obvious <br /> contaminant gsence Once retrieved and dissembled, the soil filled brass liner was removed and <br /> the ends wNe sealed with Teflon paper or foil and plastic endcaps, labeled, logged onto sham-of- <br /> custody forms and placed on crushed ice in a chilled ice chest <br /> The boreholes were logged usmg the Unified Soil Classification System under the supervision of a <br /> registered geologist Additional lithologic information was collected to describe the subsurface <br /> geology Soil samples will be collected for analysis at five-foot intervals, at intervals of obvious <br /> contamination and possibly at stratigraphic features of interest Upon completion of the borehole <br /> drilling and collection of soil samples, depth to groundwater measurements and water samples, the <br /> boreholes were sealed per the pemnit requirements by backfilling with cement grout mixed the SJC <br /> EHD specification,placed from the bottom to top of each borchole with a trernte prpe Driff soil <br /> • cuttings,decontamination and grout water were labeled and drummed and placed on-site at a client- <br /> designated <br /> lientdesignated storage location <br /> 1.1 F eld Modifications to Work Plan <br /> Wright had initially attempted to sample the site using a Geoprobe drilling rig However the <br /> presence of a -relatively thick, cemented soil horizon caused GecrProbe refusal -so a hollowstem <br /> auger drill was used to drill the borings Due to the cemented soil, continuous sampling was not <br /> practical so five-foot interval sampling was substituted Reconnaissance soil vapor measurements <br /> were to have taken with a portable organic vapor Photoionization Detector (PID), however the PID <br /> was not delivered to the site in time for drilling. Wright searched for field indicators of <br /> contaminants (stains and odor) in each soil sample and in drill cuttings Boring B-4 was moved <br /> mward toward the tank pit dine the presence cif a naturra-1 gas hire that utility -marlong; had only <br /> partially marked The boring location movement was discussed and approved in consultation with <br /> the SJC EHD representative <br /> 2.0 Field Methods—Reconnaissance Groundwater Sampling <br /> A groundwater sample was collected from each borehole A brief summary of the sampling <br /> procedure follows Each borehole was advan the aquifer and temporarily cased for <br /> sampling Depth to groundwater measurements made to the nearest one-one hundredth of <br /> one foot, and also checked for the presence of separate phase product The water entering the <br /> borehole was sampled using a clean haul line and PVC disposable bailer, and carefully poured into <br /> the appropriate laboratory prepared contemner with rmmmurn cavitation Each wager sample was <br /> labeled,logged onto a chain-of-custody form, and placed in a chilled ice chest for transport to the <br /> . laboratory <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />