My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE HISTORY
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FURRY
>
11900
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516611
>
SITE HISTORY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2020 4:25:57 PM
Creation date
1/15/2020 4:15:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE HISTORY
RECORD_ID
PR0516611
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012706
FACILITY_NAME
BEAR CREEK WINERY
STREET_NUMBER
11900
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
FURRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06116026
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
11900 N FURRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> Central Valley Region !'NViir{iWENM. HEAI.111 ' <br /> Robert Schneider,Chair <br /> P r'PY1T rERVICF surf <br /> Winston H.Hickox Gray Davis <br /> Secretaryfor Sacramento Main Office 03 JUL 29 PM 12' 55 Governor <br /> Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/mgcb5 <br /> Protection 3443 Routier Road,Suite A,Sacramento,California 95827-3003 <br /> Phone(916)255-3000•FAX(916)255-3015 <br /> 28 July 2003 <br /> Vincent Westphal <br /> Bear Creek Winery <br /> 11900 N. Furry Road <br /> Lodi, CA 95240 <br /> RESPONSE TO ADDITIONAL MONITORING WELL INQUIRY, BEAR CREEK WINERY, <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> I have reviewed the 27 June 2003 Additional Monitoring Well(s) letter prepared by Fall Creek <br /> Engineering (FCE)that requests a"...written explanation identifying the evidence that supports <br /> requiring them to provide new monitoring wells at this time," and a delay in the installation of new <br /> groundwater monitoring wells. The Regional Board's request for a workplan to install additional <br /> groundwater monitoring wells was included in a 28 April 2003 California Water Code Section <br /> 13267 Order for Technical Reports and was originally included in 10 December 2002 Tentative <br /> Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs). <br /> The request for a delay is denied; the installation of additional groundwater monitoring wells is <br /> necessary to evaluate the impact that the wastewater application may have on groundwater quality. <br /> As described below, the existing groundwater monitoring network is inadequate. <br /> Installation of groundwater monitoring wells is commonly required to establish background <br /> groundwater conditions prior to wastewater application and Bear Creek Winery (BCW) is presently <br /> applying wastewater to a number of land application areas that are not equipped with groundwater <br /> monitoring wells. It should be understood that groundwater monitoring wells may not be required <br /> at all land application areas immediately,but wells are required for all active land areas and will be <br /> required prior to application of wastewater as each new land area is brought into service. It is <br /> reasonable and cost effective from BCW's perspective to prepare a groundwater monitoring well <br /> installation workplan that describes where all the wells will be located thereby presenting a unified <br /> monitoring plan in one report. The alternative is to submit a series of workplans to address new <br /> land application areas as they are needed for wastewater application. <br /> Staff note that the request to delay installation of groundwater monitoring wells is a fundamental <br /> change in position for FCE, having recommended installation of an additional well in numerous <br /> documents, even as recently as the 31 January 2003 Review of Tentative Waste Discharge <br /> Requirements letter. In addition, FCE's 27 June 2003 letter does not accurately present the history <br /> of the groundwater investigation at the site, stating, "While the need to make our case on the basis <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> cycled Paper <br /> The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. <br /> For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs,see our Web-site at http://www.swrob.ca.gov/mgcb5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.