Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> 23 October 1998 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0184 <br />' Page 3 of 4 ' <br /> 3 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> TPH-g was detected in each well sampled, with concentrations as high as 150,000 parts per billion <br />' (ppb, reported as micrograms per liter) Benzene was detected at concentrations as high as 46,000 <br /> ppb TPH-d was detected in the sample from MW4 at a concentration of 28,000 ppb DIPS was <br /> detected in the sample from MW-3 at a concentration of 4 4 ppb MTBE was detected in samples <br />' collected from VW-2B, VW-3 and VW-4 at concentrations of 1,200 ppb, 1,000 ppb and 990 ppb, <br /> respectively. 1,2-Dichloroethane (DCA) was detected in three of the ten wells sampled at <br /> concentrations as high as 2,500 ppb (VW-2B) Four additional constituents were detected with EPA <br />' Method 8260 at concentrations as high as 3,100 ppb (1,2,4-tnmethylbenzene, MW-4) Analytical <br /> results are summarized on Tables 2 and 3 The laboratory report (MAI sample Nos 92680-92689) <br />' and chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix B <br /> a <br /> Hydrocarbon concentrations detected in samples collected from MW4,VW-2B, VW-3, VW-4 and <br />' VW-5B are indicative of the presence of free product Lower hydrocarbon concentrations were <br /> detected in MW-7, located between MW4 and the remaining wells The lower hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations detected in samples collected from MW-1,MW-2 and MW-3 are probably due to the <br /> i deep drowning of these wells (22 feet). <br />' 4.0. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based upon data collected from the site, AGE concludes the following <br /> • Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in each well sampled, at concentrations as high as <br />' 150,000 ppb Although not measurable in the wells, free product appears to remain at the <br /> site Additional monitoring wells will be necessary to delineate the horizontal extent of <br /> hydrocarbon-impacted ground water <br />' Concentration�of hydrocarbons detected at the site have generally remained stable <br /> • The inferred ground water flow direction was toward the northeast during the July 1998 <br />' monitoring event The inferred flow direction has generally been toward the east to southeast <br /> at the site <br />' Ground water is approximately 22 feet above the screened interval in monitoring wells MW- <br /> 1 through MW-3,twelve feet above the screened interval in MW4 and seven feet above the <br /> screened interval in MW-7 These wells recharge rapidly, possibly preventing significant <br />' drawdown during purging The hydrocarbon concentrations detected in these `drowned' <br /> wells may not be representative of shallower ground water where the maximum hydrocarbon <br /> impact would be expected <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmentat,Inc. <br />