Laserfiche WebLink
' 06 April 1998 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 95-0184 <br />' Page 2 of 4 <br /> Preservative The samples were labeled,placed in a chilled container and transported under chain-of- <br /> custody to McCampbell Analytical, Inc (MAI) in Pacheco, California The samples were analyzed <br /> in accordance with EPA Method 5030/8015m for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as <br />' gasoline (TPH-g), in accordance with EPA Method 602/8020 for volatile aromatics hydrocarbons <br /> (benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene and xylenes,BTE&X)with methyl tertiary-butyl ether(MTBE)and <br /> in accordance with EPA Method 8260 for volatile organic compounds and oxygenated compounds <br />' The sample from MW-4 was also analyzed in accordance with EPA Method 8015m for total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as diesel (TPH-d) <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> 1 <br />' 3 1 RELATIVE GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> The average depth to ground water at the site was 38 69 feet below the well casing tops during the <br /> January 1998 monitoring event Ground water elevation increased an average of 1 0 feet between <br /> October 1997 and January 1998 Ground water was approximately 16 feet above the screened <br /> • interval in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 Ground water elevations in these wells were <br /> similar to elevations measured in surrounding wells at the site Vapor well VW-5 was installed at <br /> an angle of approximately 15° from vertical and therefore was not used for calculating the ground <br /> water flow direction <br /> The inferred ground water flow direction in January 1998 was generally toward the east with a <br /> gradient of approximately 0 002 ft/ft (Figure 3) The gradient was more steep toward the western <br /> side of the site Free product with a thickness of less than 0 01 feet was measured in VW-213, VW--3 <br /> and VW-5C with the interface probe during the January 1998 monitoring event, traces of product <br /> were noted in well MW-4 during purging <br /> 3 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> TPH-g was detected in each well sampled, with concentrations as high as 170,000µg/1 (micrograms <br /> per liter, equivalent to parts per billion, ppb) Benzene was detected at concentrations as high as <br /> 38,000 ppb TPH-d was detected in the sample from MW-4 at a concentration of 9,100 ppb Di- <br /> isopropyl ether(DIPS)was detected in the sample from MW-3 at a concentration of 5 4 ppb MTBE <br /> was detected in samples collected from VW-2B, VW-3, VW-4 and VW-5B at concentrations of <br /> 1,300 ppb, 1,400 ppb, 1,200 ppb and 280 ppb, respectively 1,2-Dichloroethane (DCA)was detected <br /> in the samples from MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 at concentrations of 14 ppb, 25 ppb and 9 7 ppb, <br /> respectively Eleven additional constituents were detected with EPA Method 8260 at concentrations <br /> as high as 7,400 ppb (1,2,4-tnmethylbenzene, MW-4) Analytical results are summarized on Tables <br /> IAdvanced GeoEnveronmental,Inc <br /> 1 , <br />