Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Quarterly Report - First Quarter 2000 <br /> LARRY'S AUTO REPAIR <br /> 308 North Grant Street, Stockton, California <br /> 1.0. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF WORK <br /> IAt the request of Mr Charles Skobrak,Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc (AGE) has prepared this <br /> report summarizing ground water monitoring activities performed at 308 North Grant Street, <br /> Stockton, California during the first quarter of 2000 Quarterly ground water monitoring was <br /> conducted on 16 February 2000 The location of the site is illustrated on Figure 1 Structures and <br /> well locations are illustrated on Figure 2 Background information was summarized in Quarterly <br /> IReport -August 1997 prepared by AGE <br /> 2.0 PROCEDURES <br /> I <br /> Field work was performed in accordance with San Joaquin County Public Health Services - <br /> I Environmental Health Division (PHS-EHD) and Regional Water Quality Control Board - Central <br /> Valley Region (RWQCB-CVR) guidelines for the investigation of underground storage tank {UST) <br /> sites <br /> 2 1 MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES <br /> I On 16 February2000, a Solinst water meter was used to measure the depth to ground water in four <br /> P <br /> I monitoring wells and five vapor wells at the site relative to the tops of the well casings An Ullage <br /> interface probe was also used to check for the presence of free product in wells MW-4, VW-2B, <br /> VW-3, VW-4 and VW-5B The ground water elevations, ground water flow direction and hydraulic <br /> gradient were determined from these data (Table 1) Monitoring well MW-2 was not assessable due <br /> to flooding at the site and therefore was not monitored <br /> I <br /> After measuring depths to ground water, monitoring wells MW-1, MW-3, MW-4 and MW-7 and <br /> I vapor wells VW-2B, VW-3, VW-4, VW-5B and VW-5C were purged using a 2-stage submersible <br /> purge pump The purge pump was decontaminated prior to purging each well using an Alconox <br /> solution and clean nnse water Approximately 6 to 21 gallons of water (a minimum of 3 well <br /> volumes) were remover] from each purged well Water was purged from near the top of the water <br /> surface to assure removal of stagnate water trapped within the non-screened section of the drown <br /> I wells Temperature, pH and conductivity were measured at regular intervals during purging The <br /> measured properties of the purged water and the field sheets are included in Appendix A The purged <br /> water was stored on-site in 55-gallon DOT-approved drums pending laboi atory analyses <br /> I <br /> Advanced GcoEn\Ironmental,Inc <br />