My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011761
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GRAND CANAL
>
2233
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0504944
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011761
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2020 9:24:25 AM
Creation date
1/17/2020 8:52:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011761
RECORD_ID
PR0504944
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0006428
FACILITY_NAME
BRIDGES SPECIALTY CENTER, THE
STREET_NUMBER
2233
STREET_NAME
GRAND CANAL
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95219
APN
11011006
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2233 GRAND CANAL BLVD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i J <br /> Geolo d Tzchnus Inc Page 2 <br /> Badges Specialty Center <br /> Report-Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Pro)ect No 377 2 <br /> October 13,1995 <br /> 3.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> 3.1 Hydrology of Site <br /> On September 25, 1995, the measured depth to groundwater ranged from between <br /> 7 5 and 8 5 feet below ground surface across the site The groundwater gradient had <br /> a slope of 0 0075 ft/ft, and a bearing of north 340 west (Figure 2) This contrasts with <br /> the earlier groundwater monitoring event where the gradient appeared to be to the <br /> north/northeast at approximately 0 001 ft/ft <br /> 3.2 Groundwater Sampling <br /> On September 25, 1995 monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 were purged and <br /> groundwater samples collected Groundwater quality parameters recorded while <br /> purging the wells are tabulated below in Table 1 Due to the fact that the pH meter <br /> could not be successfully calibrated, the pH, although recorded, should not be <br /> considered a representative parameter <br /> Groundwater sampling procedure was performed in accordance with the <br /> groundwater sampling protocols outlined in Section 3 3 <br /> Table 1 Groundwater Quality Parameters/Purge Volumes 9/25/95 <br /> Well o ume Temp Condu p *Topof DepthWater t0VM Measu- Wetted <br /> Purged F° ctivity Casing to Level* Head- red Casing <br /> (gals) gmhos/ Water Space Total Volume <br /> CM (ft) (ppm) De th (gals) <br /> MW-1 413 819 -406 0 2040 195 <br /> �2 0 704 0690 N A Milky color <br /> -20 702 0660 N A <br /> -20 696 0620 N A <br /> MW-2 413 810 -3 97 0 1960 184 <br /> -20 685 0560 N A <br /> -20 688 0610 N A <br /> -20 690 0620 N A <br /> MW-3 4 08 7 95 -3 87 D 19 4b 184 <br /> �z a 72 a 1130 N A <br /> -20 690 1060 1 N A <br /> -20 686 1050 1 N A <br /> • Elevation of monitoring well measuring point(top of well casing) is taken from Morrow Surveying's, Monitoring Well <br /> Exhibit Prepared for CRC Environmental Risk Management,Inc,December,1994 <br /> t The OVM(organic vapor meter)measures volatile organic compounds in gaseous phase with ionization potentials less than <br /> 10.2 electron volts <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.