Laserfiche WebLink
Human Health Risk Assessment <br /> C Former Mobil Oil Bulk Plant 04-343 <br /> 500 East Grant Line Road <br /> Tracy, California <br /> Low dissolved-phase hydrocarbon concentrations have historically :,een detected along the <br /> northern margin of the site in Monitoring Wells AW-3 and AW-9. t-letectable concentrations <br /> i ' of dissolved-phase hydrocarbons have also been detected in the newly installed Monitoring Wells <br /> AW-10 and AW-12. The lateral extent of dissolved-phase hydrocarbons has been fully <br /> characterized. No liquid-phase hydrocarbons have been detected in an) round water monitoring <br /> ' wells. A summary of results of ground water monitoring and sat, pling is presented in <br /> Table 1-3. <br /> Aquifer Pumping Test Results <br /> ' On April 13, 1993, step drawdown testing of one monitoring well (AW-9) was conducted to <br /> evaluate onsite pumping well efficiency and well yield. A 48-hour constant-rate pump test was <br /> conducted from AW-9, from April 14 to April 16, 1993, to estimate th aquifer transmissivity, <br /> storativity, and lateral groundwater flow rates. Monitoring Wells AW-i, AW-10, AW-11, and <br /> ' AW-12 were used as observation wells during the constant-rate pun.v test. The locations of <br /> aquifer test wells and other wells are shown in Figure 1-3. <br /> SLep Drawdown Test <br /> ' Step drawdown testing is conducted by pumping water from a well at sequentially increasing <br /> rates, and monitoring the water level drawdown in the well with pressure transducers connected <br /> to an automatic data logger. The water level change in response to pumping during the first step <br /> determines the rate of increase for the following steps. Generally, four pumping steps and one <br /> ' recovery step are attempted. <br /> On April 13, 1993, data were generated for three pumping steps and one recovery step. <br /> ' Pumping steps lasted approximately 76 minutes at 1.14 gallons per minute (gpm), 165 minutes <br /> at 1.7 gpm, and 22 minutes at 2.86 gpm. At the end of pumping Step 3, the water level in the <br />' well reached the pump inlet, and ground water recovery data were collected. Step test data were <br /> analyzed using the Rorabaugh approach to define well efficiency factor s related to frictional and <br /> turbulent head losses, As the velocity of water entering the well i icreases with sequential <br /> pumping rates, head losses are also predicted to increase. Drawdown eras not observed in any <br /> of the observation monitorine wells. <br /> 30-0136-11 <br />' 1-8 <br />