Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> • ,, MEMORANDUM <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD • CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road,Suite A Phone:(916)255-3000 <br /> Sacramento,CA 95827-3098 CALNET:8-494-3000 <br /> To: Wendy L. Cohen From: Joel M. Weiss <br /> Senior Engineer Engineering Geologist <br /> Date: 18 July 1996 Signature: <br /> Subject: STATUS OF INVESTIGATION AT CHEVRON PIP NE SITE, CORNER OF <br /> CORRAL HOLLOW AND GRANT LINE ROADS, TRACY, SAN JOA QUIN COUNTY <br /> I have reviewed the file and two latest reports entitled Results of Soil and Ground Water Investigation <br /> (15 December 1995) and April 1996 Ground Water Monitoring and Deep Ground Water Assessment <br /> (9 July 1996). The following is a summary of the work completed so far and the work needed to <br /> begin remediating the site. <br /> A pipeline leak in 1987 caused gasoline and diesel contamination of soil and ground water at the <br /> site. The immediate spill area was excavated (approximately 100 cubic yards) and backfilled with <br /> clean fill although it is unclear if any soil confirmation sampling was done in the excavation. The <br /> lateral extent of soil contamination has been fairly well-defined with borings, except for the area <br /> directly east of the leak. Chevron believes that the vertical extent of soil contamination is limited <br /> to about 12 feet below the ground surface (bgs), but there are no analytical data to back this up. <br /> It is unclear if soil sampling was conducted during the drilling of the ground water monitoring <br /> wells at the site. <br /> Ground water is approximately 10 feet bgs and flows to the east-northeast. There are 11 ground <br /> water monitoring wells at the site, all of them north of the leak area. Better lateral definition of <br /> ground water contamination is needed to the east and south of the leak area. The recent <br /> installation of MW­14 included obtaining a hydropunch sample from a relatively deep portion of <br /> the aquifer. That sample contained 80 µg/1 of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg). <br /> Because the wellwas completed as a shallow well (screened from 6 to 26 feet bgs), there is still no <br /> means of monitoring the vertical extent of ground water contamination. <br /> Historical ground water data are sporadic, and sampling commonly occurred during the dry season. <br /> It would be appropriate to begin monitoring the wells at the site on a quarterly basis. Lead and <br /> methyl t-butyl ether should be included in the analytical protocol for at least the first quarter. <br /> Chevron believes that intrinsic bioremediation is occurring at the site based on certain indicator <br /> parameters. However, the spatial trends of these parameters are still unclear, and benzene and <br /> gasoline concentrations have not declined significantly in the last five years since ground water <br /> sampling began. Recent benzene concentrations are as high as 5,200 µg/l, and TPHg concentrations <br /> are up to 58,000 µg/1. In an August 1994 letter, Chevron proposed the use of oxygen-releasing <br /> compounds to help promote bioremediation. This technique should be acceptable as an interim <br /> remedial measure at this time as long as the plume is better defined and monitoring continues. <br /> JMW'mw/lsb <br />