Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> �' WINZLER�KELLY <br /> C p N 5 U L T I N G E N G I N E E R 5 <br /> Mr James Ueda <br /> ' May 26, 2004 <br /> Page 3 <br /> ' Soil and Water The soil and groundwater generated during well installation, development, <br /> Storage/Disposal. and sampling was stored along the northern wall of the site in 55-gallon <br /> DOT-approved drums Wmzler&Kelly will coordinate the appropriate <br /> ' disposal of the soil and groundwater and will provide the SJCEHD with <br /> copies of the appropriate manifests upon completion <br /> ' Well Surveying- Monitoring well MW-4 was not surveyed prior to this report <br /> ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES <br /> ' The laboratory analysis of the three soil samples collected on April 1,2004 by EPA Method 8015M <br /> did not identify the presence of TPH-G or other organic material at concentrations above the <br /> laboratory's reportable detection limits (RDLs) Similarly, there were no volatile organic compounds <br /> ' identified above the laboratory's RDLs in the 8260B analysis A summary of the analytical results of <br /> the soil samples is provided in Table 1 The laboratory report, QA/QC data, and chain-of-custody <br /> form for the soil samples are included in Appendix C <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING RESUL'T'S <br /> The groundwater elevation data measured in the monitoring wells at the site is presented in Table 2 <br /> A groundwater contour map,provided as Figure 3, illustrates the groundwater elevation contours and <br /> ' flow direction at the site on Apnl 7, 2004 As Figure 3 shows, the groundwater flow direction at the <br /> site was toward the northeast, at an approximate gradient of 0 02 ft/ft <br /> ' During purging activities, the parameters of pH, conductivity, temperature, and oxidation-reduction <br /> potential were monitored in the groundwater extracted from the wells A summary of these indicator <br /> parameters is provided in Table 3 <br /> ' The laboratory analysis of the groundwater samples collected from MW-4 by EPA Methods 8015M <br /> and 8260B did not identify the presence of any petroleum related constituents above the laboratory's <br /> RDLs A comprehensive summary of the analytical results of the groundwater samples collected <br /> ' from monitoring wells at the site is provided in Table 4 Total xylenes and MTBE were the only <br /> petroleum-related constituents detected in the groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells <br /> MW-1 through MW-3, and the concentrations at which they were present were below the applicable <br /> ' regulatory limits Notably, no petroleum related constituents were detected in the groundwater <br /> samples collected from monitoring well MW-1, which during previous sampling events had the <br /> highest concentrations present Figure 4 depicts the concentrations of TPH-G,benzene, and MTBE in <br /> the groundwater samples collected on April 7,2004 <br /> The laboratory analysis of the trip blank by EPA Method 8015M18020 did not detect TPH-G or <br /> BTEX constituents above the laboratory's RDLs The laboratory QA/QC included the use of method <br /> {� blanks to exclude false-positive analyses and the use of laboratory control samples to evaluate the <br /> �1 <br />