My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GRANT LINE
>
502
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0528085
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2020 3:32:58 PM
Creation date
1/22/2020 3:19:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0528085
PE
2959
FACILITY_ID
FA0019016
FACILITY_NAME
PG&E TRACY SERVICE CENTER
STREET_NUMBER
502
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
GRANT LINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25027008
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
502 E GRANT LINE RD
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Site Description and History site, around the former gasoline UST, contains <br /> The site is approximately five acres and is located in elevated levels of VOCs in the subsurface. In addition <br /> a commercial/industrial area of Tracy, California to VOCs in soil gas, there is evidence of minor <br /> (Figure 1). PG&E uses the site as a service center for impacts to groundwater in the area of the former <br /> storing and distributing material and equipment for gasoline UST.The soil gas and groundwater impacts <br /> PG&E's work crews. The site is entirely fenced and around the former gasoline UST are likely to be <br /> includes a parking lot, storage area, and a garage/ eliminated as a result of soil removal activities. <br /> office building. Human Health Risk Assessment <br /> From 1927 to 1930, a manufactured gas plant A Human Health Risk Assessment (HRA) shows <br /> operated at the site. This gas plant produced gas for that none of the chemicals present at the site pose a <br /> the lighting, cooking, and heating needs of local significant health risk to the on-site workers or <br /> residents. The plant was dismantled and removed nearby populations. However, PG&E has selected to <br /> from the property between 1930 and 1934; cleanup the site to allow for unrestricted land use, to <br /> however, some residues of the gas-making process the greatest degree possible. In order to do this, <br /> remain on site. DTSC has determined that PAHs and VOCs in the <br /> Site Investigations soil would require some form of cleanup if the site is <br /> Since the early 1980s, PG&E has conducted redeveloped at a later date for residential purposes. In <br /> investigations, monitoring, and remedial activities. <br /> order to restore the site to a condition that would be <br /> protective of all future land uses, some form of soil <br /> Since 1986, a series of environmental investigations cleanup is necessary. <br /> have been conducted at the site. Results of soil <br /> samples indicate that soil in six areas of the site Draft Removal Action Workplan <br /> contain residues from former MGP operations and/or The objective of a draft RAW is to evaluate the <br /> a release from an on-site gasoline underground nature and extent of impacts at the site and to <br /> storage tank (UST).The residues include PAHs, identify a preferred alternative which prevents or <br /> TPHs, and VOCs. Soil impacts are generally found reduces potential risks to public health and the <br /> at a depth of one to 13 feet below the ground's environment. Cleanup alternatives are evaluated <br /> surface,with the majority of impacts at a depth of based on a variety of factors including effectiveness, <br /> one to three feet. ability to be implemented, regulatory agency and <br /> Samples of soil gas (the air in between soil particles) public acceptance, and cost. <br /> indicate that one area in the northwest corner of the Before DTSC makes a final decision to approve, <br /> modify, or deny a draft RAW, it is made available for <br /> a public comment during a 30-day public comment <br /> t period.All comments are reviewed and considered <br /> °1 before the decision on the draft RAW is made. <br /> r ° Cleanup Alternatives Considered and <br /> Recommended <br /> DTSC and PG&E evaluated a variety of alternatives <br /> for cleanup of the soil and soil gas. DTSC examined <br /> four cleanup alternatives were evaluated for the site, <br /> as summarized below: <br /> t v 1. No Action-This alternative was evaluated to <br /> provide a baseline against which other cleanup <br /> alternatives can be compared. This alternative <br /> would involve no cleanup action and the site <br /> would remain in its current condition. <br /> Figure 1:Site Map <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.