Laserfiche WebLink
Soil Suitability/ Nitrate Loading Study Irerracon <br /> Manteca Farm Improvement ;- Manteca, California <br /> October 29, 2019 Terracon Project No. NA197073 <br /> 2.4.2 Methods of Mitigation <br /> Mitigation may consist of the utilization of an advanced water treatment product, which are <br /> specifically designed to lower nitrates at point of discharge or other mitigation options. <br /> 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> In summary the site soils consisted of silty sands to 10+feet bgs. Percolation test boring B1 was <br /> excavated to a depth of 3.5 feet bgs and resulted in satisfactory percolation rates of 2.77 minutes <br /> per inch. Based on the favorable percolation results, the site soils appear suitable for a standard <br /> septic system. <br /> Depth to groundwater is anticipated at approximately 34.5 feet bgs with an anticipated <br /> northeasterly groundwater flow direction. Groundwater samples were collected from a faucet <br /> connected to the private groundwater well, located adjacent west of the classroom building. <br /> Nitrate as N was reported at 32 mg/L in groundwater sample GW-1 above the MCL of 10 mg/L-N <br /> or 140 mg/L nitrate above the MCL of 45 mg/L nitrate. Groundwater sample GW-2 reported below <br /> laboratory reporting limits of 0.010 ug/L for DBCP. <br /> The site is currently developed with two septic systems and is proposed to be developed with a <br /> third septic system. Septic System No. 1 (existing classroom building) nitrate balance is 24.1 <br /> mg/L-N above the MCL. Septic System No. 2 (existing office building)nitrate balance is 3.2 mg/L- <br /> N below the MCL; however, the combined nitrate loading balance for both Septic System No. 1 <br /> and No. 2 is 17.1 mg/L-N, above the MCL of 10 mg/L-N. Septic System No. 3 (proposed 15,000 <br /> SF agricultural building) nitrate loading balance is 15.3 mg/L-N which is anticipated to further <br /> increase nitrate in the aquifer above the MCL to 23.3 mg/L-N when combined with the existing <br /> classroom building. As the existing office building will be demolished when the proposed 15,000 <br /> SF agricultural building is developed,the office building was not included in the final nitrate loading <br /> calculation. <br /> In summary, the parcel appears suitable for the proposed development. The septic system design <br /> should accommodate the peak flows and follow the San Joaquin County OWTS standards where <br /> applicable. Elevated nitrates were identified in the private groundwater well above the MCL. If <br /> the EHD requires mitigation for the project, an advanced water treatment product may be <br /> considered a mitigation option. <br /> 4.0 LIMITATIONS <br /> As indicated, our study takes into account the subject property only with the sewage load applied <br /> over the property site area. The study does not take into account surrounding properties and/or <br /> lands. The method utilized for the nitrate loading analysis is based on a simple mass balance <br /> formula, discussed in a published article by Hantzsche and Finnemore (1992), which provides a <br /> Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 19 <br />