Laserfiche WebLink
► ATC Associates Inc <br /> ., M%TC <br /> r 1117 Lone Palm Avenue, Suite B <br /> Modesto, California 95351 <br /> 209-579-2221 <br /> fax 209-579-2225 <br /> ASSOCIATES INC <br /> On February 26, 1993, Parker Environmental Services (P E S ) advanced seven soil borings (BH 1 <br /> through BH7) Soil samples were collected from each boring and a groundwater sample was collected <br /> from each boring except BH7 Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples collected from all <br /> the borings except BH 1 and BH3 Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in all of the groundwater <br /> samples Water levels measured at the site on March 2, 1993, indicated the groundwater flow direction <br /> was to the southeast Refer to P E S 's Interim Report on Subsurface Investigation Work at Cheapen #37 <br /> dated April 20, 1993 for more details <br /> From July to October 1995, P E S conducted subsurface investigation activities that included installing <br /> four monitoring wells (MW5 through MWS) and advancing 14 hand augured soil borings (138 through <br /> B21) B15 through B21 were advanced off-site to the west, southwest, and south Groundwater was <br /> encountered at approximately 6 5 feet bgs Soil and groundwater samples were collected from B8, 1310 <br /> through B18, B20, B21, and MWS through MW7 A groundwater sample was also collected from MWS <br /> Petrol um hydrocarbons were detected in all of the soil samples except for the samples collected from <br /> 4* MWAhrough MW7, B14 located east of the former UST location, and B20 and B21 located off-site to <br /> Q \1� the southwest and south, respectively Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected to the groundwater <br /> samples except the samples collected from B14, B20, B21, MW1, MW2,MW3, MW6, and MW7 MW4 <br /> was not sampled due to the presence of approximately 0 02 inches of free product The reported <br /> groundwater flow direction on September 25, 1995, was approximately due north Refer to the report <br /> prepared by P E S titled Environmental Site ,Investigation Methods and Findings Drilling of Soil <br /> Borings, Drilling and Installation of Groundwater Monitoring Wells Collection and Analyses of Soil and <br /> • Groundwater Samples, dated November 17, 1995 for more information <br /> In a letter dated April 11, 2002, the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) <br /> indicated that upgradient monitoring wells MW2 and MW3 could be reduced to annual monitoring and <br /> that the lateral and vertical extent of soil contamination remains undefined The EHD requested submittal <br /> of a workplan to define the lateral and vertical extent of soil contamination In response to the EHD <br /> request, H2OGEOL submitted the Work Plan for Additional Soil Characterization dated June 10, 2003, <br /> which proposed advancing 14 hand auger borings at the site for the purpose of collecting soil samples <br /> On September 11 and 12, 2003, a 500-gallon used oil UST was excavated and removed from the site by <br /> Walton Engineering, Inc Petroleum hydrocarbons and metals were detected in a soil sample collected <br /> base of the UST from a depth of approximately seven feet bgs Refer to Grayland Environmental's <br /> Underground Storage Tank and Fuel Dispenser Removal Report, dated October 16, 2003, for more,- <br /> information <br /> ore,- <br /> information <br /> In September 23 and 24, 2003, H2OGEOL collected groundwater samples from MW I and MW4 through <br /> MWS Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in groundwater samples collected from these wells The <br /> reported groundwater flow direction was to the north Refer to H2OGEOL's Third Quarter, 2003 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report, dated October 31, 2003, for more information <br /> In a letter dated November 14, 2003, the EHD indicated that the proposed scope in the 142OGEOL <br /> workplan was not adequate or necessary The EHD requested that a workplan be prepared in the context <br /> of a site conceptual model that includes analytical data collected during removal of a waste oil tank from <br /> 0 the site in September 2003 The requested workplan was submitted by ATC on February 2, 2004 <br /> sIenviromenta1125847100371reportsllstQTR-2006 doe 2 <br />