WORK PLANS_FILE 1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ms. Mary Meays November 14, 1997 Page 2 During our meeting,we also had a discussion as to whether Tosco could be a"responsible parry"with respect to a release that occurred prior to the time Tosco acquired the property. Neither the statute nor the regulations relevant to underground tank cleanups define the term "responsible party". However, it is my understanding that most regional boards, as well as the State Water Resources Control Board, have taken the position that someone who purchases a property on which a release from an underground storage tank has occurred may be ordered to take steps to investigate and remediate that release; i.e., be a "responsible party". Where, as here, the purchaser has contractually agreed to undertake such responsibilities,has acknowledged that responsibility in writing, has control of the property and has paid for such actions, it seems entirely reasonable and consistent with both the statute and state policy that Tosco be considered "responsible party." In particular, Tosco appears to fall squarely within the definition of`operator", which includes "any person in control of, or having daily responsibilities for, the daily operation of an underground storage tank system." California Health and Safety Code§25281(1). At our meeting, we spent some time discussing the fact that the former NMI, 8, and 11 appear to have been abandoned without a permit. These wells were still in place and were sampled during the January 16, 1997, sampling event which is the last quarterly sampling event that occurred during Union's ownership of the site. This is consistent with the view you expressed at the meeting that the wells had been abandoned sometime during the summer of 1997. By copy of this letter to Tom Skok, I am requesting that Tosco provide written information both to Union and to you regarding what efforts will be undertaken to locate these wells and to ensure their proper abandonment. Finally, to the extent that the County finds it necessary to communicate with Union with respect to the station, I requested that all such correspondence be directed to me at the address indicated above. All other correspondence regarding Union Oil sites in San Joaquin County should be directed to Mr. Boost at the address and/or phone number indicated in my November 7, 1997 letter to you. If you have any questions regarding the foregoing, or wish to discuss any aspect of these matters, please do not hesitate to call me. Z rs,iec cc: Gordon Boggs, CVRWQCB Robert Boost David Irey, San Joaquin County Dcputy District Attorney David Luick,Dayton Hudson Corporation Jim Munch, SWRCB W. Thomas Skok,Esq.