Laserfiche WebLink
N. UNOCAL LAW DEPT. 11 . 18. 1997 17: 09 <br /> • <br /> • F. L <br /> ��.____..__� <br /> 970 80YIh Velenele Avenue <br /> Brea,Cellfornla 02823 <br /> Faaelmlle(Y14)jj )677.2 802 <br /> E melt PN emlecauneeel,00m <br /> UNOCAL® <br /> November 14, 1997 <br /> Peter J.Nlemleo <br /> Aadatant Counsel <br /> Asset Manaaemanr Oroup <br /> Ms.Mary Mcays <br /> Senior RENS <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue <br /> P Floor <br /> Stockton, California 95202 <br /> RE: 4707 Pacific Avenue.Stockton. CA <br /> Dear Ms,Maeys: <br /> In response to our meeting in your offices on Monday November 10, 1997, enclosed is a copy of the <br /> Environmental Agreement between Union Oil Company of Callfornie and Tasty Corporation, This Agreement Is a <br /> supplemental agreement to the Sale and Purchase Agreement for 76 Products Company,dated December 14, 1996 which <br /> is the agreement pursuant to which Union Oil Company of California transferred its operating refining and marketing <br /> assets to Tosco. As I have informed you, the closing date on that We was April 1, 1997. <br /> Pursuant to Paragraph 5(a) of the Environmental Agreement, Tosco agreed to conduct all "Baseline Corrective <br /> Action." As you can see from looking at Paragraph I(b)of the Environmental Agreement, "Baseline" means all releases <br /> that occurred prior to closing. Thus, Tosca agreed to address all releases at stations that it acquired pursuant to this <br /> Agreement Also note that Tosco agreed to pay the first$7 million of "Baseline Corrective Action Costs" on an annual <br /> basis and 40%of the amount of such costs above the annual cep. <br /> In your memo to me of November 10, you noted that you requested a"list of contractual agreements since January <br /> 1, 1997 between consultants; MPDS, OeoStraiegics and Pacific Environmental; and Unocal and Tosco , . ." I indicated <br /> to you at the meeting that I did not think that such a list would be helpful In resolving who actually paid for work done at <br /> the 4707 Pacific Avenue station. At least with respect to Union Oil, these companies performed work for Union Oil <br /> under a master agreement, so that a list of such agreements would not be useful in determining how payments were <br /> made. Union Oil's files for this station do not reflect any invoices dated later than December 1, 1996. It is our current <br /> belief that later Invoices for work done at the station are in possession of Tosco. However, according to Robert Boust, <br /> who Is the project professional responsible for Union Oil's properties in San Joaquin County, and the individual who <br /> initially approves contractor's invoices for work done on behalf of Unocal in this was. the contractors in question were <br /> advised of the sale of assets to Tosco, and accordingly forwarded all bills for work perfbrmed after April 1, 1997 directly <br /> to Tosco. <br />