Laserfiche WebLink
'am,WWI <br /> • Working To Restore Nature <br /> design and construction, including the utilization of a larger slot size should improve well <br /> performance This, however, might result in the production of some silt during pumping <br /> which could require surface filtration <br /> Test Results: Long-Duration Constant Rate Test <br /> Because a large component of the drawdown in well PTW-1 during the long-term test was <br /> due to well loss, the actual drawdown in the formation away from the production well was <br /> relatively small This is clear from the observation well drawdown versus time plots (Plates <br /> 4-PT and 5-PT),which showed total drawdown ranging from 0 12 foot in well MW-6 (85 feet <br /> from well PTW-1) and 0 39 foot in well MW-7 (13 feet from well PTW-1) <br /> Well drawdown versus time plots (both log-log and semilog plots) were prepared for <br /> observation wells MW-6 and MW-7 (Plates 4-PT, 5-PT, 9-PT, and 10-PT) Plate 8-PT <br /> presents the drawdown in wells MW-6, MW-7, and MW-11 after 980 minutes of pumping <br /> versus their respective distances from the pumping well (PTW-1) Table E1 shows the <br /> transmissivity and storage coefficient values calculated from these plots using the methods <br /> of Copper and Jacob (1946), and Neuman (1972) <br /> Transmissivity value calculated from production well PTW-1 drawdown are probably not <br /> representative due to the effects of partial penetration The calculated transmisstvity values <br /> • from the observation well data may differ due to actual variations within the water-bearing <br /> zone Well logs support this interpretation of heterogeneity and anisotropy The calculated <br /> early time storativity and specific yield values also vary somewhat but are clearly indicative <br /> of unconfined conditions <br /> No identifiable boundary conditions were detected in the test data There is, however, a <br /> noticeable decrease in the rate of drawdown in observations wells MW-6 and MW-7 after <br /> approximately 20 - 40 minutes (Plates 4-PT and 5-PT) This slope change is probably due <br /> to the effect of dewatering which results in a small amount of delayed drainage in the <br /> unconfined aquifer This effect is common in unconfined, vertically stratified aquifers and <br /> is accounted for in the Neuman type curve analysis depicted in Plates 9-PT and 10-PT The <br /> early time storativity (S) calculated from this analysis (Table E1) is applicable to the early <br /> pumping time prior to significant dewatering of the aquifer The Sy (specific yield) value <br /> shown on the plates and on Table E1 is representative of the longterm volume of water <br /> released from storage per unit surface area per unit decline in the water table The <br /> calculated values of 5 percent and 9 percent are consistent with unconfined silty and well- <br /> graded sands <br /> • <br /> 38032-10 <br />