Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Howard Hold <br /> August 27, 2004 <br /> Page 3 <br /> to ensure that MW2 also represents background conditions. The data from these two <br /> shallow monitoring wells then provides greater assurance that the plume is localized <br /> beneath the ponds and has not migrated downgradient and affected the ground-water <br /> quality monitored at MW2. In the event that the ground-water quality results at MW5A <br /> indicate that there has been an impact at the new location, another background well may <br /> be required. <br /> • MW6A: Presently, there are no monitoring wells located north of and at a position close <br /> enough to the north pond to provide control on the plume estimate in this direction. A <br /> shallow zone monitoring well is planned at a location that would also be within an area <br /> considered downgradient of the ponds. Monitoring results for this location would <br /> provide an indication of the magnitude of impacts that have occurred in the vicinity of the <br /> ponds at a location further removed from the ponds than existing shallow zone wells <br /> (e.g., MW i and MW3A). A monitoring well at the revised location is also anticipated to <br /> be beneficial for further assessing corrective action measures and for inclusion in the <br /> corrective action monitoring program. <br /> • MW6B: Similar to what is described above for well MW6A, control is lacking north of <br /> the ponds and a deep zone monitoring well is proposed (e.g., this well is positioned at a <br /> location presently down gradient to cross gradient of the observed direction of ground- <br /> water flow in the deep zone). The proposed location to the north would provide <br /> additional gradient control at a location away from facility pumping and would also <br /> provide additional information to further refine the apparent limited impact of historical <br /> operations on the deep zone. <br /> Test Holes <br /> Test holes will be drilled at each of the two well locations using mud rotary drilling methods. <br /> The first test hole(at the MW613 well location) will be drilled to a depth of approximately 250 <br /> feet. The test hole borehole diameter will be 8-3/4 inches;cuttings samples will be collected at <br /> 10-foot intervals or when there is a change in lithology. Following drilling, geophysical logs <br /> will be run in the borehole for spontaneous potential and a resistivity suite (long and short <br /> normal and single point). MW6B will be constructed in the test hole. Final well designs will be <br /> based on interpretation of the geophysical log, lithologic data, and prior geologic information for <br /> the site. <br /> Following the construction of MW613, the drilling rig will move over approximately 10 feet and <br /> drill a 12-1/4-inch diameter borehole to approximately 150 feet for the construction of MW6A. <br /> Geophysical logging will not be conducted in the MW6A borehole since the logging of the <br /> MW613 borehole should provide adequate definition of subsurface conditions at this monitoring <br /> location. Following the construction and development of MW6A and MW6B, the drilling rig <br /> will move to the MW5A site. The test hole at this location will be constructed to a depth of <br /> about 150 feet. Upon reaching the target depth, a geophysical log will be conducted as described <br /> previously for the MW6B site. <br />