Laserfiche WebLink
Wendy Cohen,SLIC Unit -3- I*.rr i February 1996 <br /> Y <br /> equivalent to the following concentrations in water: <br /> Unleaded Gasoline 1400 µg/1 <br /> Diesel Fuel 56 µg/1 <br /> JP-4 Jet Fuel 560 µg/1 <br /> JP-5 Jet Fuel 140 µg/1 <br /> These criteria are based on animal studies with whole fuel mixtures. They would be relevant to <br /> implementation of the narrative toxicity objective in the Basin Plan for these hydrocarbons in <br /> ground water. For BTEX, the most limiting criteria would be OEHHA's cancer potency factor for <br /> benzene (equivalent to 0.32 µg/1) and the following taste &odor thresholds: <br /> toluene 42 µg/1 <br /> ethylbenzene 29 µg/1 <br /> xylenes 17 µg/1 <br /> The only polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon found during the four recent sampling periods was <br /> fluorene, with a USEPA reference dose (IRIS) equal to 280µg/1 in water. All samples in which <br /> fluorene was found had concentrations well below this health-based criterion. <br /> Data Quality and Quantity Issues <br /> Analytical quantitation limits have varied significantly during the investigation of this site. <br /> During the four recent sampling events (1994 and 1995) TPPH (gasoline-range hydrocarbons) <br /> quantitation limits were 500µg/l, ten times higher than the limit listed in the Tri-Regional <br /> Recommendations for Evaluation of Underground Tank Sites. TEPH (diesel-range hydrocarbons) <br /> quantitation limits were 20 times higher than listed in the Tri-Regional Recommendations. <br /> Quantitation limits equal to those listed in the Tri-Regional Recommendations were used during <br /> the 1992 sampling. Artificially high quantitation limits can magic the discovery of potential water <br /> quality impacts. <br /> The Regional Water Board monitoring program called for four quarters of ground water sampling; <br /> however,only three monitoring events have occurred under the program for wells MW 4A, <br /> MW-8A, MW-11A,MW-12A, and MW-13. In addition, a smaller set of analytes were run in the <br /> earliest sampling period for the other nine wells;TPPH and TRPH were omitted. Therefore, a full <br /> four quarters of ground water data have not been generated under the monitoring program. <br /> Field Study <br /> To examine the extent of biodegradative activity at the site, Geomatrix conducted a"Field Study" <br /> on samples from the wells with the greatest water quality impact (MW-13 and MW-23). To <br /> examine the potential contribution of entrained sediment, split samples from these wells were <br /> filtered prior to analysis for TRPH and diesel-range hydrocarbons (TEPH) and centrifuged prior to <br /> analysis for gasoline=range hydrocarbons (TPPH). To examine the contribution of"biogenic" <br /> hydrocarbons (formed by the degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons by microorganisms), silica . <br /> gel cleanup was performed on split samples from these wells prior to analysis for diesel-range <br /> hydrocarbons. To examine both effects together, split samples were cleaned up with silica gel <br /> prior to filtration and analysis for diesel-range hydrocarbons. I shared this information with our <br />