Laserfiche WebLink
i Wendy Cohen,SLIC Unit -5- 1 February 1996 <br /> concentrations. The higher analytical quantitation limits of the recent four sampling periods <br /> may have masked an existing problem at MW-24. Well logs of these borings could also help <br /> clarify the marked differences between results from these two wells. <br /> My Recommendations <br /> To move this case toward closure, I recommend that the following actions be taken by the <br /> discharger: <br /> 1) Submit the items identified in the enclosed Appendix B, Requests for Closure, to the Tri- <br /> Regional Board Staff Recommendationsfor Preliminary Investigation and Evaluation of <br /> Underground Tank Sites that have not already been submitted. Materials that have already <br /> been submitted should be referenced in this submittal. Substitute "pipeline" for all <br /> references to "tank systems" in the wording of Appendix B. <br /> 2) To more clearly delineate subsurface hydrogeology at the site, submit well boring logs for all <br /> wells and a hydrologic cross section in the direction parallel to the pipeline and extending <br /> from monitoring well MW-7 through well MW-15. <br /> 3) Perform two additional quarters of ground water monitoring—I recommend the first and <br /> second quarters of 1996=for all wells sampled during 1994 and 1995 plus wells MW-16, <br /> MW-17, MW-18, and MW-19. Samples should be analyzed for diesel-range and gasoline- <br /> range petroleum hydrocarbons by GC-FID and for BTEX by USEPA Method 8020 without <br /> filtration. Centrifugation and silica gel cleanup of diesel-range hydrocarbon samples are <br /> acceptable, but not necessary. Diesel-range (extractable) hydrocarbons should be limited to <br /> hydrocarbons with C1O through C23 chain lengths. Gasoline-range (purgeable) hydrocarbons <br /> should be limited to hydrocarbons with C4 through C 12 chain lengths. Analytical quantitation <br /> limits should match those of the Tri-Regional Recommendations. <br /> 4) Based on the results of the additional monitoring performed under Recommendation#3 <br /> above, a decision on the need for future monitoring would be made. Future monitoring (in <br /> addition to that recommended in Recommendation#3) may be able to be eliminated if <br /> appropriate source removal activities are conducted, such as removal and treatment of <br /> contaminated soils in the areas of monitoring wells MW-13 and-MW-23. <br /> Enclosure <br />