Laserfiche WebLink
M <br /> J � <br /> roll'\ <br /> 1�+ Harding Lowson Asaaelatas <br /> II. TECHNICAL EVALUATION <br /> The rerledial alternatives <br /> considered in the technical <br /> portion of our feasibility <br /> study are listed below: <br /> r A. emedial Al <br /> e natives - Grou d Water <br /> P" 1• Extraction Alternativv,' <br /> t Vertical, extraction <br /> - stem <br /> Horizontal extractionsystem <br /> " - 2• Treatment Alternatives <br /> rs4 - Air stripping <br /> @ - Liquid-phase activated carbon treatment <br /> Biological treatment <br /> g - Gxidation using ultraviolet light Peroxide 9. and hydrogen <br /> Physical containment <br /> No action - <br /> 3. i <br /> y D sposal Alternatives <br /> Discharge to storm <br /> - Dischar e. drain <br /> _ g to sanitary sewer <br /> Pischarge:to irrigation district facilities <br /> - Injection to eUbsurface <br /> r - <br /> Off-site disposal <br /> B• <br /> f <br /> 1 Removal Alternatives <br /> e unrestricted excav$tion. <br /> Restricted excavation <br /> ' Treatment Alternatives r <br /> „ 2. <br /> Z n Aeration <br /> �a f.,. <br /> r ndfarming <br /> n Chemical oxidation <br /> - .. - Incineration <br /> Soil venting <br /> s No action <br /> 2. <br />