Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> gg <br /> I <br /> "O"din9 Lawson Associates <br /> This technique can be combined with ground-water <br /> extraction and recharge to remediate contaminatedrou <br /> g nd water, <br /> or the ground water can be left to biodegrade, Construction, <br /> ', : <br /> monitoring, and recharge permits would be required. <br /> A slurry wall is not practical for such a small site. <br /> f.., It requires relatively large construction <br /> r g equipment, as well as <br /> demolition of .ortions of the site, This alternative will not be <br /> given further consideration. <br /> 110-action - The no-action alternative involves leaving <br /> a l the ground water in place and instituting no remedial activities. <br /> Evaluations would be re <br /> [. . } quired to determine the potential movement <br /> y of: hydrocarbon constituents and impacts on human health and the <br /> environment. Long-term monitoring may be required. <br /> The no-action alternative has been demonstrated to be <br /> � the most <br /> practical and desirable alternative in situations where <br /> because of physical and chemical characteristics of the site, ' <br /> ssl minimal impact will occur <br /> 4 <br /> r to <br /> humans ans ar the environment. This <br /> alternative is institutionally acceptable. <br /> The no-action alternative would require that Southland <br /> accept a long-tern liability related to exposure Of humanelth <br /> .. <br /> and the environment .to.a migrating plume of ful hydrocarbons. <br /> r <br /> This liability is unacceptable to Southland and will not be given <br /> y further consideration. <br /> +`r 3 s s •v IS <br /> e s o sewe Under this:: alternative <br /> , <br /> ground water would be discharged to the Tracy ;storm sewer system <br /> 10 <br />