Laserfiche WebLink
The pumping test report also provides a capture zone analysis f o r <br /> extraction well EW-I. A capture zone is the area of a aquifer in which all <br /> of the groundwater will be removed by a pumping well at a specific <br /> pumping rate over period of time. Boundary conditions were n o t <br /> considered in this analysis. The following assumptions were made in the <br /> capture zone analysis: a sustainable pumping rate (Q) of 7 gpm (1 ,347.5 <br /> cubic feet per day), a saturated thickness (B) of 12.58 feet, a hydraulic <br /> conductivity (K) of 23.7 ft/day, a potentiometric surface gradient of <br /> 0.0105, and an assumed porosity of 0.15. Based on the capture zone <br /> analysis, well spacing to capture all water flowing from the site would be <br /> 32.3 feet perpendicular to the groundwater flow direction. <br /> Groundwater samples were also collected from the extraction well <br /> periodically during the pump test. Samples were collected at 7 minutes, <br /> 330 minutes, 660 minutes and 995 minutes into the test. These samples <br /> were contained in 40-m1 VOA vials, preserved with hydrochloric acid, and <br /> sealed without headspace. The samples were then labeled and stored with <br /> ice for transport to McCampbell Analytical, Inc. of Pacheco, California <br /> (FLAP #1644) under chain of custody. The samples were then analyzed by <br /> McCampbell Analytical for TPH-G by modified EPA Method- -5030/8015 , <br /> -� BTEX by EPA Method 8020, and the fuel oxygenates MTBE, DIPS, ETBE, <br /> TAME and TBA by EPA Method 8260. Analytical results for these samples <br /> are tabulated a Table Four. The laboratory analytical report and chain of <br /> custody documents are presented in Appendix J. There was n o <br /> discernable increasing or decreasing trend in hydrocarbon concentrations <br /> during the test. <br /> 8 .3 Vapor Extraction Test <br /> On September 26, 2001, ASE senior project manager David Allen, in <br /> conjunction with personnel. of Environmental Techniques of Huntington <br /> Beach, California, conducted a vapor-extraction (VE) test at the site. The <br /> test was designed to remove a known rate of soil -as from vapor <br /> extraction well VE-1 using a vacuum-blower powered by the power take- <br /> off of a 6-cylinder internal combustion engine (ICE), measure vacuum and <br /> the amount of air flowing from VE-1, and determine if that vacuum can <br /> influence the vadose zone in nearby observation wells. Just prior to the <br /> removal of soil gas from well VE-1, observation wells VE-2, MW-2, MW-3, <br /> MW-4 and EW-1 were fitted with sealed caps and negative-pressure gauges <br /> to record any increase in negative pressure within these wells located at <br /> various distances from VE-1 . An initial, background, negative-pressure <br /> reading was taken from the five observation wells prior to the beginning <br /> of the test. <br /> 574 West Grant Line Road CAP — January 2002 <br /> -14- <br />