Laserfiche WebLink
n <br /> mismatching of the well to the native formation will have to be addressed and corrected (to <br /> whatever extent is possible) with well development actions, alone. <br /> Well development work can be directed in two ways: <br /> First, specific well development actions can be called for by the geologist who <br /> installed the wells or by another professional reviewing that installation work. <br /> Typically, consultants specify the use of certain equipment and techniques. <br /> Second, the consultant or client can define the goal which is being sought and <br /> place limits on the amount of effort which should be taken to achieve the goal. <br /> Of the two types of direction, the second is far more common and also more important. Defining <br /> the extent of effort which can be expended is vital to controlling costs on a project and scheduling <br /> personnel and equipment to complete the work. Moreover, it is possible to undertake and <br /> complete work without the added and frequently unnecessary effort of working out very detailed <br /> specification which may be impractical or unwarranted. This does not mean that our personnel <br /> cannot make use of well installation logs when they are available or are not receptive to very <br /> specific directions from the consultant. It does, however, mean that when very detailed directions <br /> are given, rapid communication between our personnel and the geologist become very important. <br /> This is especially true of sites where multiple wells have been installed, because wells even a short <br /> distance apart may demonstrate quite different characteristics which may require a rapid <br /> -' reevaluation of what well development procedures are appropriate in light of the hydrologic <br /> condition presented by the native formation at that location on the site. <br /> In most cases, tightly controlled action sequences are less productive than more general directions <br /> combined with plain statements of what evaluation criteria should be used for judging the <br /> progress and completeness of the well development work. The most common standards are <br /> volumetric (removal of set volumes of water), recharge rate, and water clarity (measured as <br /> nephelometric turbidity units). Given these goals-and limitations, our personnel can proceed with <br /> the work without supervision or direction by relying on empirical information obtained directly <br /> from the water in the well <br /> Selection of Development Equipment <br /> Each Blaine Tech Services, Inc. vehicle provided for a well development project will have a wide <br /> assortment of development tools including stainless steel surgeblocks and swabs, several types of <br /> pumps and complete instrumentation for determining standard parameters. Special equipment <br /> which included certain types of winches,jetting heads, and drop surging pumps can be provided. <br /> Well Development Report 950802DV Pacific Environmental Group,inc.I Chevron k9-4183 I Lodi Page 3 <br />