Laserfiche WebLink
FROM t 1956.06-11 11:55 #686 P.04104 t <br /> June 11, 1998 <br /> Page 3 <br /> TPPH-g. .Based on these observations, the STCEM feels that the TPPH-g impact in.the <br /> area of soil sample PD-3 is of limited extent. The SICF-Hi]remains in support of a letter <br /> requiring no further action <br /> PEG concurs with the observations of the WEED in regard to the TPPH g impact in <br /> the location of soil sample PD 3. In addition to the apparently limited extort of TPPH-g <br /> impact in that area,PEC}notes that the'TPPH-g concentration detected in soil sample <br /> P17-3 is not accompanied by detectable concentrations of benzene or methyl-tertiary-- <br /> butylether,the primary constituents of Concern with regard to the protection of drinking <br /> water resources_ <br /> s On behalf of Tosco,PEG hereby requests the issuance of a letter requesting no further <br /> investignive or remedial action for the subject site. <br /> Should have al questions. x comments lease feel free to contact our office. <br /> Sh you atid�don qu a s o , g <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Pacific EnvironmeaW Group,Inc. <br /> Timothy L.Ripp <br /> Project Geologist <br /> RG 6745 <br /> Attachment; . Soil SamplitrgR,esults}or Siaiion Upgrade, dated May Z, 1998 <br /> cc(without attachment): <br /> Mr.Harlin Knoll, San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division <br /> Mr.David Camilley Tiowo Marketing Company <br /> Mr, Scott Hooton, $P Oil <br /> 3111741A/CLD81.£r.DQC <br />