Laserfiche WebLink
Tri-Regional Recommendations Page 12 of 24 <br /> Appendix A <br /> Explanation for TABLE #2: MINIMUM VERIFICATION ANALYSES <br /> 1 As other methodologies are developed and accepted by the USEPA and the DHS, they may also be used if <br /> they have equal or better performance than the listed methods <br /> 2 For drinking water sources,USEPA and DHS recommend that the 500 series methods for volatile organics be <br /> used in preference to the 8000-wastewater series methods due to lower detection limits and superior <br /> laboratory QA/QC The 500 series currently comparable to Method 8260B is Method 524 2 <br /> 3 Appropriate analyses are to be used for detection of leaking tank contents For example, there may be <br /> multiple fuels dispensed from the individual tank over its active life Regulators must determine if the UST <br /> was used for multiple fuels, and require the appropriate analyses <br /> 4 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) and diesel(TPHd) ranges(volatile and extractible, <br /> respectively) are to be analyzed and characterized by GC/FID with a fused capillary column and prepared by <br /> EPA method 5030 (purge and trap) for volatile hydrocarbons, or extracted by sonication using Method 3550 <br /> for extractable hydrocarbons Fused capillary columns are preferred to packed columns, a packed column <br /> may be used as a"first cut" with "dirty" samples or once the hydrocarbons have been characterized and <br /> proper QA/QC is followed <br /> 5 Silica gel cleanup of TPHg and TPHd samples to remove weathered hydrocarbons or breakdown products is <br /> not acceptable, as these compounds removed may contribute to impairment of beneficial uses of water <br /> through adverse taste and odor and/or toxicity If natural background compounds are suspected to be <br /> contributing to high TPH concentrations that are not associated with the petroleum hydrocarbon release, <br /> comparison with samples from background locations, out of the influence of the petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> release may be used to Justify adjusting TPH concentrations <br /> 6 Tetraethyl lead analysis may be requested if the total lead concentration exceeds the naturally occurring(or <br /> background) concentration for lead <br /> 7 Oil and Grease (O &G) analysis may be requested when heavy, straight chain hydrocarbons are present As <br /> of 1 January 2002, US EPA requires O &G analysis by EPA Method 1664A <br /> 8 Practical Quantitation Limits (PQLs), also called Reporting Limit by many laboratories, are influenced by <br /> analytical method selection, matrix problems and laboratory QA/QC procedures The PQLs shall be equal to <br /> or lower than the detection limits (DLRs)for purposes of reporting published by DHS <br /> (http //www dhs ca gov/ps/dsdwem/chemicals/DLR/dtrindex htm) or the minimum levels(MLs)published by <br /> the State Water Resources Control Board in Appendix 4 of the Policy for Implementation of Toxics Standards <br /> for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California <br /> (http //www swrcb ca gov/iswp/index html),which ever is lower When such PQLs are not achievable, an <br /> explanation must be submitted on the laboratory data sheets <br /> 9 PQL chain-of-custody and the signed laboratory data sheets are to be submitted containing the laboratory's <br /> assessment of the condition of the samples on receipt including temperature, suitable container type, air <br /> bubbles present/absent in VOA bottles,proper preservation, appropriate holding time, etc The sheets must <br /> also include the dates sampled, submitted,prepared for analysis, and analyzed <br /> • <br />