My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_SITE INVESTIGATION AND WELL DESTRUCTION PERMIT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HANSEN
>
24550
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0537774
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_SITE INVESTIGATION AND WELL DESTRUCTION PERMIT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2020 6:19:39 PM
Creation date
1/29/2020 4:40:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
SITE INVESTIGATION AND WELL DESTRUCTION PERMIT
RECORD_ID
PR0537774
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0021779
FACILITY_NAME
FED X GROUND TRACY PROJECT
STREET_NUMBER
24550
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
HANSEN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
24550 S HANSEN RD
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CRA MEMORANDUM Page 5 <br /> 10.0 Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD) Analyses <br /> To evaluate the effects of sample matrices on the extraction or digestion process, measurement procedures, <br /> and accuracy of a particular analysis, samples are spiked with a known concentration of the analyte of <br /> concern and analyzed as MS/MSD samples. The relative percent difference (RPD) between the MS and MSD <br /> is used to assess analytical precision. If the original sample concentration is significantly greater than the <br /> spike concentration,the recovery is not assessed. <br /> The MS/MSD samples were spiked with all compounds of interest. All percent recoveries and RPD values <br /> were within the laboratory control limits, demonstrating acceptable analytical accuracy and precision. <br /> 11.0 Field QA/QC Samples <br /> The field QA/QC consisted of one trip blank sample, one field blank sample, one equipment blank sample <br /> and one field duplicate set. <br /> Trip Blank Sample Analysis <br /> To evaluate contamination from sample collection, transportation, storage, and analytical activities, the trip <br /> blank was submitted to the laboratory for VOC analysis. All results were non-detect for the compounds of <br /> interest. <br /> Field/Equipment Blank Sample Analysis <br /> To assess field decontamination procedures, ambient conditions at the site, and cleanliness of sample <br /> containers, the field and equipment blanks were submitted for analysis, as identified in Table 1. All results <br /> were non-detect for the analytes of interest. <br /> 12.0 Target Compound Identification <br /> To minimize erroneous compound identification during organic analyses, qualitative criteria including <br /> compound retention time and mass spectra, if applicable, were evaluated according to the identification <br /> criteria established by the methods. <br /> 13.0 Conclusion <br /> Based on the assessment detailed in the foregoing, the data summarized are acceptable without <br /> qualification. <br /> EQUM EMPLOYMENT OWOMNM EMPLO k <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.