Laserfiche WebLink
Angelica Sandoval Marin [EH] <br /> From: Scott <SBittinger@stratusinc.net> <br /> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 11:26 AM <br /> To: Angelica Sandoval Marin [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 1140 W. Hammer Lane, Stockton <br /> Basically, on the 241h & 25th, we will be sampling 102 S. Wilson Way (18 wells) and 1140 W. Hammer(3 wells). I would <br /> expect the Wilson Way work to take 1.5 days, and the Hammer Lane work to only take 3 hours or so. If you want exact <br /> times, call Carl Schulze at 805-712-6375, as he will be the one doing the work. <br /> Scott. <br /> From: Angelica Sandoval Marin [EH] [mailto:amarin@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 11:21 AM <br /> To: Scott <br /> Subject: RE: 1140 W. Hammer Lane, Stockton <br /> Scott, <br /> Please let me know date and time that tech will be on site. <br /> Thanks <br /> Angelica <br /> Angelica Sandoval Marin, Senior REHS <br /> San Joaquin County, Environmental Health Department <br /> 1868 E. Hazelton, CA 95205 <br /> (209)468-2807 desk <br /> (209)468-0341 fax <br /> Email: amarin@sicehd.com <br /> From: Scott [maiIto:SBittinger@stratusinc.net] <br /> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 11:10 AM <br /> To: Nuel Henderson [EH] <br /> Cc: cori.condon@waterboards.ca.gov; Angelica Sandoval Marin [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 1140 W. Hammer Lane, Stockton <br /> The 3 d quarter sampling event will be performed next week. <br /> It is really hard to evaluate ozone injection on the basis of`remedial efficiency', unlike vapor extraction or DPE. With ex- <br /> situ techniques, if you drop from 60 lbs/day to 6 lbs/day recovery, the decline is apparent. In this case,we are using <br /> data from only a few wells sampled once every three months to evaluate performance in-situ. <br /> Harlin Knoll verbally told me, when we designed the cleanup plan 2+years ago, that he thought that the case was a good <br /> closure candidate even before remediation started, because the plume was stable and relatively small. But the high <br /> level of benzene in MW-11 at the time prevented low threat closure. Thus the groundwater data from one well was <br /> used as the basis for starting remediation, and now data from this well and new well MW-12 (which was added to <br /> provide an additional data point) are really the only data points being used to evaluate remedial performance. <br />