Laserfiche WebLink
Workplan for Vertical Groundwater Investigation <br /> And Bench Test for In-Situ Oxidation <br /> 7835 Thornton Road, Stockton, CA <br /> Page 5 of 8 <br /> All drilling and sampling equipment will be decontaminated between uses. Soil cuttings generated <br /> from drilling activities and wastewater produced from equipment decontamination will be <br /> contained on site in lined 20 cubic yard roll off bins pending waste characterization and disposal. <br /> Well Development, Surveying and Groundwater Sampling <br /> The elevation of the well casing collar will be surveyed to an accuracy of 0.01 feet. A minimum <br /> of 48 hours after completion, an experienced field technician will measure static depth to water, <br /> and then develop the well by pumping and surging until turbidity is minimized. A minimum of <br /> three casing volumes will be purged from the well. <br /> Groundwater samples will be collected into the appropriate containers after pH, temperature, and <br /> electrical conductivity have stabilized and water has recharged to minimum of 80% of static <br /> levels. The samples will be placed into an ice chest refrigerated to a temperature of <br /> approximately 4°C for shipment to a State-certified laboratory under chain of custody protocol. <br /> Groundwater samples will be analyzed for BTEX and MTBE using EPA Method 802113, TPHg <br /> using EPA Method 8015M, and lead using EPA Method 6010 or equivalent. <br /> PROPOSED REMEDIAL ACTIONS <br /> Despite the lack of groundwater plume migration and the limited volume of impacted soil <br /> remaining below the excavated area, contaminant concentrations in groundwater remain elevated. <br /> Although historical analytical results exhibit a declining trend in contaminant concentrations, at <br /> the current rate of attenuation it would be decades before concentrations fall below drinking <br /> water standards. As a result, EHD requested remedial actions be implemented at the site. <br /> We propose to evaluate the potential for the injection of an oxidizing solution to accelerate the <br /> pace of cleanup. We have selected in-situ oxidation over groundwater extraction and treatment <br /> for the following reasons: <br /> 1. The City of Stockton will acquire 3,282 square feet of the property for the Hammer Lane <br /> widening project; much of the acquired land is around well MW5, the heart of the <br /> contamination plume. The land acquisition would render much of the heart of the plume <br /> inaccessible to an extraction well. However, an oxidizing solution could be injected through <br /> borings placed within the City right of way under an encroachment permit issued by the City. <br /> Mr, Mike McDowell of the City of Stockton indicated that such a permit is feasible for soil <br /> borings advanced within a negotiated time window, but that the City would not permit <br /> installing a well. In-situ oxidation would allow access to a greater portion of the plume than <br /> would groundwater extraction. <br /> 2. Based upon calculations of residual contaminant mass in soil and groundwater beneath the <br /> site, more than 95% of the contamination remains sorbed to saturated soil. Groundwater <br /> G:%GROUNDZEIKNOW LES.HAMIREPORTSIW KPLAN_deepwell_bench2.doe <br />